On irredundant incomplete decision table
Author affiliations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15625/1813-9663/22140Keywords:
The reduct, tolerance relation, rough set theory, irredundant incomplete decision table.Abstract
In rough set (RS) theory, the issues raised by attribute reduction are significant [14]. Currently, these issues garner interest and extensive research from numerous scientists worldwide. To investigate the problem of incomplete decision tables (IDTs), M. Kryszkiewicz developed the notion of relative relation (also known as tolerance relation) [13]. In this study, researchers address algorithmic issues related to attribute reduction in IDTs using a relational database approach. In [12], the authors proved that the result of the Sperner system (SS) is equivalent to the reduct set within the incomplete decision table. Specifically, for a given Spener system K, there exists an inverted version of the IDT, referred to as the redundancy set of K. In this study, based on the objects in the IDT, we propose the concept of an IDT without redundancy, meaning its rows are not redundant in the IDT. According to the columns and rows of the decision table, we have developed an effective algorithm whose complexity is the most polynomial. We can locate an irredundant incomplete decision table because the algorithm supports IDT.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. We hereby assign copyright of our article (the Work) in all forms of media, whether now known or hereafter developed, to the Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics. We understand that the Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics will act on my/our behalf to publish, reproduce, distribute and transmit the Work.2. This assignment of copyright to the Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics is done so on the understanding that permission from the Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics is not required for me/us to reproduce, republish or distribute copies of the Work in whole or in part. We will ensure that all such copies carry a notice of copyright ownership and reference to the original journal publication.
3. We warrant that the Work is our results and has not been published before in its current or a substantially similar form and is not under consideration for another publication, does not contain any unlawful statements and does not infringe any existing copyright.
4. We also warrant that We have obtained the necessary permission from the copyright holder/s to reproduce in the article any materials including tables, diagrams or photographs not owned by me/us.
