3D printing of phase change hydrogels

Author affiliations

Authors

  • Md Alal Hossain \(^1\) Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5167-1471
  • Shajuyan Ahmed \(^1\) Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3596-0193
  • Md Sabir Hossain \(^1\) Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1407-6412
  • Khan Rajib Hossain \(^2\) State Key Laboratory of Solid Lubrication, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
    \(^3\) Department of Natural Sciences, BGMEA University of Fashion & Technology, Dhaka1230, Bangladesh
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5199-1682

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15625/2525-2518/21229

Keywords:

3D printing, phase change materials, hydrogels, applications

Abstract

Phase change materials (PCM) can change from solid to liquid at a constant temperature, allowing them to retain more heat than other materials. 3D printing of PCM with hydrogels opens up new manufacturing possibilities by increasing productivity and functional diversity. This article reviews recent advances in phase change hydrogel 3D printing, focusing on metal-infused hydrogels, graphene-based, bio-based PCM, and chitosan-based materials. In particular, a new 3D printing method was developed, in which rheology was modulated using carbomers to produce a variety of functional hydrogels, including magnetic, dual-network, thermosensitive, and other types. Highly loaded PCM/cellulose nanofiber (CNF) ink and phase change organic hydrogel (PCOH) are new options for such encapsulation and thermal stability. This article discusses how hydrogels resemble the extracellular matrix and can be used in bioprinting to support basic biological processes. Despite all the progress, more research is needed to address issues such as the flexibility of PCM and achieving high energy storage density. This review article highlights how hydrogels and 3D printing can have a revolutionary impact. Future directions and potential applications in the field of flexible electronics, responsive drug delivery systems, and tissue engineering are covered in this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Hyun D. C., Levinson N. S., Jeong U., Xia Y. - Emerging applications of phase-change materials (PCMs): teaching an old dog new tricks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 53(15) (2014) 3780-3795. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201305201.

2. Shahrubudin N., Lee T. C., Ramlan R. - An overview on 3D printing technology: Technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manuf., 35 (2019) 1286-1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089.

3. Chen Z., Zhao D., Liu B., Nian G., Li X., Yin J., Qu S., Yang W. - 3D printing of multifunctional hydrogels. Adv. Funct. Mater., 29(20) (2019) 1900971. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201900971.

4. Yin C., Lan J., Wang X., Zhang Y., Ran R., Shi L.-Y. - Shape-stable hydrated salts/polyacrylamide phase-change organohydrogels for smart temperature management. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 13(18) (2021) 21810-21821. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c03996.

5. Schild H. G. - Poly (N-isopropylacrylamide): experiment, theory and application. Prog. Polym. Sci., 17(2) (1992) 163-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6700(92)90023-r.

6. Zheng Y., Zhu Y., Yu Z., Zhu J., Zhang Y., Ye Y., Zheng D., Jiang F. - Passive thermal regulation with 3D printed phase change material/cellulose nanofibrils composites. Compos. B: Eng., 247 (2022) 110332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110332.

7. Jungst T., Smolan W., Schacht K., Scheibel T., Groll J. - Strategies and molecular design criteria for 3D printable hydrogels. Chem. Rev., 116(3) (2015) 1496-1539. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00303.

8. Li J., Wu C., Chu P. K., Gelinsky M. - 3D printing of hydrogels: Rational design strategies and emerging biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep., 140 (2020) 100543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2020.100543.

9. Chimene D., Lennox K. K., Kaunas R. R., Gaharwar A. K. - Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: a materials science perspective. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 44(6) (2016) 2090-2102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1638-y.

10. Rajabi M., McConnell M., Cabral J., Ali M. A. - Chitosan hydrogels in 3D printing for biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym., 260 (2021) 117768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117768.

11. Zhang A., Wang F., Chen L., Wei X., Xue M., Yang F., Jiang S. - 3D printing hydrogels for actuators: A review. Chin. Chem. Lett., 32(10) (2021) 2923-2932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.073.

12. Liu S., Chen X., Zhang Y. - Hydrogels and hydrogel composites for 3D and 4D printing applications. In 3D and 4D Printing of Polymer Nanocomposite Materials, Elsevier (2020) 427-465.

13. Suntornnond R., An J., Chua C. K. - Bioprinting of thermoresponsive hydrogels for next generation tissue engineering: a review. Macromol. Mater. Eng., 302(1) (2017) 1600266. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201600266.

14. Zhou Y.-C., Yang J., Bai L., Bao R.-Y., Yang M.-B., Yang W. - Flexible phase change hydrogels for mid-/low-temperature infrared stealth. Chem. Eng. J., 446 (2022) 137463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.137463.

15. Lei Z., Wang Q., Wu P. - A multifunctional skin-like sensor based on a 3D printed thermo-responsive hydrogel. Mater. Horiz., 4(4) (2017) 694-700. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7mh00262a.

16. Shirazi S. F. S., Gharehkhani S., Mehrali M., Yarmand H., Metselaar H. S. C., Adib Kadri N., Osman N. A. A. - A review on powder-based additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: selective laser sintering and inkjet 3D printing. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 16(3) (2015) 033502. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/033502.

17. Rahman M. H., Liza N. Y., Hossain K. R., Kalambhe D. R., Shyeed M. A., Noor D. H. - Additive manufacturing in nano drug delivery systems. Pharm. Sci. Adv., 2 (2024) 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscia.2024.100036.

18. Tian X., Jin J., Yuan S., Chua C. K., Tor S. B., Zhou K. - Emerging 3D-printed electrochemical energy storage devices: a critical review. Adv. Energy Mater., 7(17) (2017) 1700127. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700127.

19. Mehta P., Sahlot P. - Application of phase change materials in 4D printing: A review. Mater. Today Proc., 47 (2021) 4746-4752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.664.

20. Guo Y., Patanwala H. S., Bognet B., Ma A. W. K. - Inkjet and inkjet-based 3D printing: connecting fluid properties and printing performance. Rapid Prototyp. J., 23(3) (2017) 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-05-2016-0076.

21. Dai G., Lee V. - Three-dimensional bioprinting and tissue fabrication: prospects for drug discovery and regenerative medicine. Adv. Health Care Technol., (2015) 23-35. https://doi.org/10.2147/ahct.s69191.

22. Ali M. A., Rajabi M., Sudhir Sali S. - Additive manufacturing potential for medical devices and technology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng., 28 (2020) 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.05.001.

23. Trachtenberg J. E., Placone J. K., Smith B. T., Fisher J. P., Mikos A. G. - Extrusion-based 3D printing of poly (propylene fumarate) scaffolds with hydroxyapatite gradients. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 28(6) (2017) 532-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2017.1286184.

24. Placone J. K., Engler A. J. - Recent advances in extrusion-based 3D printing for biomedical applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 7(8) (2017) 1701161. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701161.

25. Kirchmajer D. M., Gorkin Iii R., in het Panhuis M. - An overview of the suitability of hydrogel-forming polymers for extrusion-based 3D-printing. J. Mater. Chem. B, 3(20) (2015) 4105-4117. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb00393h.

26. Benjamin A. D., Abbasi R., Owens M., Olsen R. J., Walsh D. J., LeFevre T. B., Wilking J. N. - Light-based 3D printing of hydrogels with high-resolution channels. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express, 5(2) (2019) 025035. https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aad667.

27. Castro N. J., O’Brien J., Zhang L. G. - Integrating biologically inspired nanomaterials and table-top stereolithography for 3D printed biomimetic osteochondral scaffolds. Nanoscale, 7(33) (2015) 14010-14022. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr03425f.

28. Do A.-V., Smith R., Acri T. M., Geary S. M., Salem A. K. - 3D printing technologies for 3D scaffold engineering. In Functional 3D Tissue Engineering Scaffolds, Elsevier (2018) 203-234.

29. Sheikh K., Hossain K. R., Hossain M. A., Sagar M. S. I., Raju M. R. H., Haque F. - 3D Printed Ionic Liquids Based Hydrogels and Applications. J. Ion. Liq., 4(1) (2024) 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jil.2024.100093.

30. Bertsch A., Renaud P. - Microstereolithography. In Three-Dimensional Microfabrication Using Two-Photon Polymerization, Elsevier (2020) 25-56.

31. Zhang J., Hu Q., Wang S., Tao J., Gou M. - Digital light processing based three-dimensional printing for medical applications. Int. J. Bioprinting, 6(1) (2019) 242. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.242.

32. Caprioli M., Roppolo I., Chiappone A., Larush L., Pirri C. F., Magdassi S. - 3D-printed self-healing hydrogels via Digital Light Processing. Nat. Commun., 12(1) (2021) 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22802-z.

33. Sun X., Tyagi P., Agate S., McCord M. G., Lucia L. A., Pal L. - Highly tunable bioadhesion and optics of 3D printable PNIPAm/cellulose nanofibrils hydrogels. Carbohydr. Polym., 234 (2020) 115898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115898.

34. Hsiao L. C., Badruddoza A. Z. M., Cheng L.-C., Doyle P. S. - 3D printing of self-assembling thermoresponsive nanoemulsions into hierarchical mesostructured hydrogels. Soft Matter, 13(5) (2017) 921-929. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sm02208a.

35. Huang C.-L., Chen Y.-B., Lo Y.-L., Lin Y.-H. - Development of chitosan/β-glycerophosphate/glycerol hydrogel as a thermosensitive coupling agent. Carbohydr. Polym., 147 (2016) 409-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.028.

36. Sydney Gladman A., Matsumoto E. A., Nuzzo R. G., Mahadevan L., Lewis J. A. - Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat. Mater., 15(4) (2016) 413-418. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4544.

37. Ashraf S., Park H.-K., Park H., Lee S.-H. - Snapshot of phase transition in thermoresponsive hydrogel PNIPAM: Role in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Macromol. Res., 24(4) (2016) 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-016-4052-2.

38. Joshi S., Rawat K., C K., Rajamohan V., Mathew A. T., Koziol K., Kumar Thakur V., A.S.S B. - 4D printing of materials for the future: Opportunities and challenges. Appl. Mater. Today, 18 (2020) 100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100490.

39. Wu W., DeConinck A., Lewis J. A. - Omnidirectional printing of 3D microvascular networks. Adv. Mater., 23(24) (2011) H178-H183. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201004625.

40. Kolesky D. B., Truby R. L., Gladman A. S., Busbee T. A., Homan K. A., Lewis J. A. - 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv. Mater., 26(19) (2014) 3124-3130. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506.

41. Sano K., Ishida Y., Aida T. - Synthesis of anisotropic hydrogels and their applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 57(10) (2018) 2532-2543. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201708196.

42. Arslan H., Nojoomi A., Jeon J., Yum K. - 3D printing of anisotropic hydrogels with bioinspired motion. Adv. Sci., 6(2) (2018) 1800703. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201800703.

43. Wei P., Cipriani C. E., Pentzer E. B. - Thermal energy regulation with 3D printed polymer-phase change material composites. Matter, 4(6) (2021) 1975-1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.03.019.

44. Kim D., Lee H. S., Yoon J. - Highly bendable bilayer-type photo-actuators comprising of reduced graphene oxide dispersed in hydrogels. Sci. Rep., 6(1) (2016) 20921. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20921.

45. Liu J., Jiang L., Liu A., He S., Shao W. - Ultrafast thermo-responsive bilayer hydrogel actuator assisted by hydrogel microspheres. Sens. Actuators B Chem., 357 (2022) 131434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2022.131434.

46. Yang Y., Tan Y., Wang X., An W., Xu S., Liao W., Wang Y. - Photothermal nanocomposite hydrogel actuator with electric-field-induced gradient and oriented structure. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 10(9) (2018) 7688-7692. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b17907.

47. Jeon S. J., Chiappelli M. C., Hayward R. C. - Photocrosslinkable nanocomposite multilayers for responsive 1D photonic crystals. Adv. Funct. Mater., 26(5) (2015) 722-728. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201503727.

48. Zhou Y., Cai Y., Hu X., Long Y. - VO2/hydrogel hybrid nanothermochromic material with ultra-high solar modulation and luminous transmission. J. Mater. Chem. A, 3(3) (2015) 1121-1126. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta05035e.

49. Hu Z., Zhang X., Li Y. - Synthesis and application of modulated polymer gels. Science, 269(5223) (1995) 525-527. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5223.525.

50. Ma C., Lu W., Yang X., He J., Le X., Wang L., Zhang J., Serpe M. J., Huang Y., Chen T. - Bioinspired anisotropic hydrogel actuators with on-off switchable and color-tunable fluorescence behaviors. Adv. Funct. Mater., 28(7) (2017) 1704568. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201704568.

51. Lim H. L., Chuang J. C., Tran T., Aung A., Arya G., Varghese S. - Dynamic electromechanical hydrogel matrices for stem cell culture. Adv. Funct. Mater., 21(1) (2011) 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201001519.

52. Huang L., Jiang R., Wu J., Song J., Bai H., Li B., Zhao Q., Xie T. - Ultrafast Digital Printing toward 4D Shape Changing Materials. Adv. Mater., 29(7) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201605390.

53. Ge Q., Chen Z., Cheng J., Zhang B., Zhang Y.-F., Li H., He X., Yuan C., Liu J., Magdassi S., Qu S. - 3D printing of highly stretchable hydrogel with diverse UV curable polymers. Sci. Adv., 7(2) (2021) eaba4261. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba4261.

54. Ge Q., Qi H. J., Dunn M. L. - Active materials by four-dimension printing. Appl. Phys. Lett., 103(13) (2013) 131901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4819837.

55. Liu S., Sheng M., Wu H., Shi X., Lu X., Qu J. - Biological porous carbon encapsulated polyethylene glycol-based phase change composites for integrated electromagnetic interference shielding and thermal management capabilities. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 113 (2022) 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.11.008.

56. Yang J., Yu W., Liu C., Xie H., Xu H. - Phase change mediated graphene hydrogel-based thermal interface material with low thermal contact resistance for thermal management. Compos. Sci. Technol., 219 (2022) 109223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109223.

57. Quan B., Wang J., Li Y., Sui M., Xie H., Liu Z., Wu H., Lu X., Tong Y. - Cellulose nanofibrous/MXene aerogel encapsulated phase change composites with excellent thermal energy conversion and storage capacity. Energy, 262 (2023) 125505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125505.

58. Er Y., Güler O., Hekimoğlu G., Nodehi M., Ustaoğlu A., Sarı A., Gencel O., Ozbakkaloglu T. - Thermophysical properties and solar thermal energy storage performance of phase change composites manufactured by vat photopolymerization 3D printing technique. J. Energy Storage, 73 (2023) 109124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109124.

59. Peng X., Wang H. - Shape changing hydrogels and their applications as soft actuators. J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys., 56(19) (2018) 1314-1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24724.

60. Qin H., Zhang T., Li N., Cong H.-P., Yu S.-H. - Anisotropic and self-healing hydrogels with multi-responsive actuating capability. Nat. Commun., 10(1) (2019) 2202. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10243-8.

61. Mishra A. K., Wallin T. J., Pan W., Xu A., Wang K., Giannelis E. P., Mazzolai B., Shepherd R. F. - Autonomic perspiration in 3D-printed hydrogel actuators. Sci. Robot., 5(38) (2020) eaaz3918. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aaz3918.

62. Zhu C., Kwok R. T. K., Lam J. W. Y., Tang B. Z. - Aggregation-induced emission: a trailblazing journey to the field of biomedicine. ACS Appl. Bio Mater., 1(6) (2018) 1768-1786. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.8b00600.

63. Cui Y., Phang I. Y., Lee Y. H., Lee M. R., Zhang Q., Ling X. Y. - Multiplex plasmonic anti-counterfeiting security labels based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Chem. Commun., 51(25) (2015) 5363-5366. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc08596e.

64. Li S., Liu Y., Zhao X., Cui K., Shen Q., Li P., Qu X., Jiao L. - Molecular engineering on MoS2 enables large interlayers and unlocked basal planes for high-performance aqueous Zn-ion storage. Angew. Chem., 133(37) (2021) 20448-20455. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202108317.

65. Han D., Yang C., Fang N. X., Lee H. - Rapid multi-material 3D printing with projection micro-stereolithography using dynamic fluidic control. Addit. Manuf., 27 (2019) 606-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.031.

66. Ha J. H., Shin H. H., Choi H. W., Lim J. H., Mo S. J., Ahrberg C. D., Chung B. G. - Electro-responsive hydrogel-based microfluidic actuator platform for photothermal therapy. Lab Chip, 20(18) (2020) 3354-3364. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0LC00458H.

67. Pinargote N. W. S., Smirnov A., Peretyagin N., Seleznev A., Peretyagin P. - Direct ink writing technology (3D printing) of graphene-based ceramic nanocomposites: A review. Nanomaterials, 10(7) (2020) 1300. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071300.

68. Le X., Lu W., Zhang J., Chen T. - Recent progress in biomimetic anisotropic hydrogel actuators. Adv. Sci., 6(5) (2019) 1801584. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201801584.

69. Zolfagharian A., Kaynak A., Yang Khoo S., Zhang J., Nahavandi S., Kouzani A. - Control-oriented modelling of a 3D-printed soft actuator. Materials, 12(1) (2019) 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010071.

70. Haghiashtiani G., Habtour E., Park S.-H., Gardea F., McAlpine M. C. - 3D printed electrically-driven soft actuators. Extreme Mech. Lett., 21 (2018) 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2018.02.002.

71. Sharifzadeh G., Hosseinkhani H. - Biomolecule-responsive hydrogels in medicine. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 6(24) (2017) 1700801. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700801.

72. Gu B. K., Choi D. J., Park S. J., Kim M. S., Kang C. M., Kim C.-H. - 3-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering applications. Biomater. Res., 20(1) (2016) 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0058-2.

73. Joung D., Lavoie N. S., Guo S. Z., Park S. H., Parr A. M., McAlpine M. C. - 3D printed neural regeneration devices. Adv. Funct. Mater., 30(1) (2020) 1906237. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201906237.

74. Tang-Schomer M. D., White J. D., Tien L. W., Schmitt L. I., Valentin T. M., Graziano D. J., Hopkins A. M., Omenetto F. G., Haydon P. G., Kaplan D. L. - Bioengineered functional brain-like cortical tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, 111(38) (2014) 13811-13816. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1324214111.

75. Lozano R., Stevens L., Thompson B. C., Gilmore K. J., Gorkin R., Stewart E. M., in het Panhuis M., Romero-Ortega M., Wallace G. G. - 3D printing of layered brain-like structures using peptide modified gellan gum substrates. Biomaterials, 67 (2015) 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.022.

76. Folkman J., Hochberg M. - Self-regulation of growth in three dimensions. J. Exp. Med., 138(4) (1973) 745-753. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.138.4.745.

77. Shengjie L., Zhuo X., Xiaohong W., Yongnian Y., Haixia L., Renji Z. - Direct fabrication of a hybrid cell/hydrogel construct by a double-nozzle assembling technology. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym., 24(3) (2009) 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911509104094.

78. Jang T.-S., Jung H.-D., Pan H. M., Han W. T., Chen S., Song J. - 3D printing of hydrogel composite systems: Recent advances in technology for tissue engineering. Int. J. Bioprinting, 4(1) (2024) 126. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v4i1.126.

79. Joung D., Truong V., Neitzke C. C., Guo S. Z., Walsh P. J., Monat J. R., Meng F., Park S. H., Dutton J. R., Parr A. M., McAlpine M. C. - 3D printed stem-cell derived neural progenitors generate spinal cord scaffolds. Adv. Funct. Mater., 28(39) (2018) 1801850. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201801850.

80. Koffler J., Zhu W., Qu X., Platoshyn O., Dulin J. N., Brock J., Graham L., Lu P., Sakamoto J., Marsala M., Chen S., Tuszynski M. H. - Biomimetic 3D-printed scaffolds for spinal cord injury repair. Nat. Med., 25(2) (2019) 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0296-z.

81. Ge G., Cai Y., Dong Q., Zhang Y., Shao J., Huang W., Dong X. - A flexible pressure sensor based on rGO/polyaniline wrapped sponge with tunable sensitivity for human motion detection. Nanoscale, 10(21) (2018) 10033-10040. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr02813c.

82. Wang E., Desai M. S., Lee S.-W. - Light-controlled graphene-elastin composite hydrogel actuators. Nano Lett., 13(6) (2013) 2826-2830. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl401088b.

83. Jeon S.-J., Hauser A. W., Hayward R. C. - Shape-morphing materials from stimuli-responsive hydrogel hybrids. Acc. Chem. Res., 50(2) (2017) 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00570.

84. Ge G., Zhang Y., Shao J., Wang W., Si W., Huang W., Dong X. - Stretchable, transparent, and self-patterned hydrogel-based pressure sensor for human motions detection. Adv. Funct. Mater., 28(32) (2018) 1802576. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201802576.

85. Ge G., Wang Q., Zhang Y. Z., Alshareef H. N., Dong X. - 3D printing of hydrogels for stretchable ionotronic devices. Adv. Funct. Mater., 31(52) (2021) 2107437. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202107437.

86. Asadi M., Salehi Z., Akrami M., Hosseinpour M., Jockenhövel S., Ghazanfari S. - 3D printed pH-responsive tablets containing N-acetylglucosamine-loaded methylcellulose hydrogel for colon drug delivery applications. Int. J. Pharm., 645 (2023) 123366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123366.

87. Kotta S., Nair A., Alsabeelah N. - 3D printing technology in drug delivery: recent progress and application. Curr. Pharm. Des., 24(42) (2018) 5039-5048. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612825666181206123828.

88. Dreiss C. A. - Hydrogel design strategies for drug delivery. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 48 (2020) 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2020.02.001.

Downloads

Published

26-02-2026

How to Cite

Hossain, M. A., Ahmed, S., Hossain, M. S., & Hossain, K. R. (2026). 3D printing of phase change hydrogels. Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology, 64(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.15625/2525-2518/21229

Issue

Section

Review

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.