Heritage clay brick characterization and assessment with compatible contemporary bricks for retrofitting of heritage monuments

Guljit Singh, Varinder Singh Kanwar, Anshu Tomar
Author affiliations

Authors

  • Guljit Singh Department of Civil Engineering, Chitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh -174103, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1782-1193
  • Varinder Singh Kanwar Department of Civil Engineering, Chitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Baddi, Himachal Pradesh -174103, India
  • Anshu Tomar Department of Civil Engineering, Chandigarh Engineering College, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Jhanjeri, Mohali-140307, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15625/2525-2518/18868

Keywords:

clay brick, Nanakshashi, Heritage, Property Characterization, Punjab

Abstract

Various mughal architecture clay brick masonry monuments were built in the Punjab state of northern India from the late 14th to late 19th centuries. Nanakshahi monuments (era of 1st Sikh Guru-Guru Nanak Dev Ji) are gigantic clay brick masonry structures constructed of lime and lime surkhi mortar (a powdered form of red burnt clay brick). Currently, this study is focused on identifying a suitable material for repairing and strengthening heritage clay brick monuments. Using the mineralogical composition of heritage Nanakshahi clay bricks (NSCB), the study compares them with contemporary clay bricks (CCB) from the same region, and then compares them to newly prepared clay bricks (NPCB), which have similar composition and dimensions to NSCB. The X-ray fluorescence confirms that the NSCB samples of southeast Punjab have an elemental composition consisting of filler SiO2 and binding elements like Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, K2O and MgO. The average density of ancient NSCB and CCB has been found to be similar; the ancient NSCB has a lower water absorption rate and porosity in contrast to the present-day clay bricks. The Initial rate of absorption  of an ancient NSCB is quite higher. In comparison to the heritage NSCB, the CCB's compressive strength value is lower and uniaxial compression strength of newly prepared clay bricks (NPCB) of similar mineralogical composition and dimensions is comparable to that of the heritage NSCB from Punjab districts. The significance of the study is to suggest a compatible material for strengthening of heritage clay brick monuments of northern India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Tomar A., Agarwal P., Singh G., and Kanwar V. S. - Seismic Damage Assessment of a Heritage Brick Masonry Structure, AIP Conf. Proc. 2451October, 2022.

2. Tomar A., Paul D. K., and Agarwal P. -Correlation Between Computed Stress Response and Observed Damage of a Heritage Masonry Building, J. Earthq. Tsunami 12 (01) (2017) 1850002.

3. Fernandes F. M., Lourenco P. B., and Castro F., Materials - Technologies and Practice in Historic Heritage Structures, Mater. Technol. Pract. Hist. Herit. Struct., 2010.

4. Nardi R. - Consolidation of a mud brick wall using simple techniques and materials, Proceedings of 8th Triennial Meeting, Sydney, Australia, ICOM-CC_ 1987_Sydney_79.pdf.” p. 503, 1987.

5. Dong C., En-Yuan W., and Nan L. - Study on the microwave effect on the physical and mechanical properties of coal, Int. J. Oil, Gas Coal Technol. 18 (1-2) (2018) 255-275.

6. Fernandes F. and Lourenco P. B. - Evaluation of the Compressive Strength of Ancient Clay Bricks Using Microdrilling, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19 (9) (2007) 791-800.

7. Elert K., Cultrone G., Rodriguez Navarro C., and Sebastian Pardo E. - Durability of bricks used in the conservation of historic buildings - Influence of composition and microstructure, J. Cult. Herit. 4 (2) (2003) 91-99.

8. Mughal M. R. - A Preliminary Review of Archaeological Surveys in Punjab and Sindh: 1993 - 95, 6030 March, 2016.

9. Singh G., Tomar A., and Kanwar V. S. - Physical, mechanical and crystallographic properties of clay bricks and mortars of the sixteenth–nineteenth century monuments of East Punjab, J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil 7 (1) (2022) 1-17.

10. C20 ASTM - Standard Test Methods for Apparent Porosity , Water Absorption , Apparent Specific Gravity, and Bulk Density of Burned Refractory Brick and Shapes by Boiling Water 1, 2000, pp. 1-3.

11. ASTM - Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Brick and Structural Clay Tile,ASTM Int., Vol. 04, 2019, pp. 1-17.

12. El-Gohary M. A. and Al-Naddaf M. M. - Characterization of bricks used in the external casing of Roman bath walls ‘Gadara-Jordan,Mediterr. Archaeol. Archaeom9(2) (2009) 29-46.

13. El-Gohary M. - The contrivance of new mud bricks for restoring and preserving the Edfa ancient granary - Sohag, Egypt, Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 3 (2) (2012) 67-78.

14. Yakubu S. O. and Umar M. B.- Design, Construction and Testing of a Multipurpose Brick / Block Moulding Machine American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), Am. J. Eng. Res. 04 (02) (2015) 33-43.

15. Bhattarai J., Ghale D. B., Chapagain Y. P., Bohara N. B., and Duwal N. - Study on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Ancient Clay Brick Samples of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, Tribhuvan Univ. J. 32 (2) (2018) 1-18.

16. Abed G. A., Manii J. K., and Ali J. H. - Some Engineering Properties of Ancient Fire Clay Bricks Discovered at the Dilbat Archaeological Site, South of Hilla City, Iraqi Geol. J. 55 (1) (2022) 121-130.

17. Baspinar M. S., Demir I., and Orhan M. - Utilization potential of silica fume in fired clay bricks, Waste Manag. Res. 28 (2) (2010) 149-157.

18. Shakir A. A., Mohammed A. A., and Mohammed A. A. - Manufacturing of Bricks in the Past, in the Present and in the Future: A state of the Art. Review 2 (3) (2013) 145-156.

19. Gordan B., Adnan A., and Gordan M. - Distribution of Specific Gravity for laterite Soil mixed using Tire Aggregate and Silica, October, 2015.

20. Fernandes F. M., Lourenco P. B., and Castro F. - Materials, Technologies and Practice in Historic Heritage Structures, Mater. Technol. Pract. Hist. Herit. Struct., May 2014, 2010.

21. Binda G. M. R. L., Tongini Folli R.- Survey and Investigation for the Diagnosis of Damaged Masonry Structures: The ‘Torrazzo’ of Cremona, 12th Int. Brick-Block Mason. Conf., 2000.

22. MD. E. 1 - Determination of moisture distribution and level using radar in masonry built with regular units, Mater. Struct. 38 (2) (2005) 283-288.

23. Binici H., Binici F., Akcan M., Yardim Y., Mustafaraj E., and Corradi M. - Physical–Mechanical and Mineralogical Properties of Fired Bricks of the Archaeological Site of Harran, Turkey, Heritage 3 (3) (2020) 1018-1034.

24. Drydale R. G., Hamid A. A., and Baker L. R. - Masonry structures-behaviour and design, Pr. Hall, Ennglewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1994.

25. Kaushik H. B., Rai D. C., and Jain S. K. - Stress-Strain Characteristics of Clay Brick Masonry under Uniaxial Compression, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19 (9) (2007) 728-739.

26. Rai D. C. and Dhanapal S. - Mineralogical and mechanical properties of masonry and mortars of the lucknow monuments circa the 18th century, Int. J. Archit. Herit. 9 (3) (2015) 300-309.

27. Drysdale R. G., Hamid A. A., and Baker L. R. - Masonry structures: behavior and design, 1994.

28. Mamillan M. - Methodes dessais au gel des pierres, Problems Raised by Frost Action, In: 6th international congress of the fondation française d’Etudes Nordiques, Le Havre, 1979, pp. 225-238.

29. Cultrone G., Sebastian E., Elert K., de la Torre M. J., Cazalla O., and Rodriguez-Navarro C. - Influence of mineralogy and firing temperature on the porosity of bricks, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 24 (3) (2004) 547-564.

30. Diagnosis D. E. and Tratamiento Y. - Manual de diagnosis y tratamiento de materiales petreos y ceramicos, 1997.

31. Papayianni I. and Stefanidou M. - Characteristics of bricks of Byzantine period, In:12th Int. Brick/Block Masonry Conf. Proc. vol. 3, 2000, pp. 1729-1736.

32. Livingston R. A., Stutzman P. E., Mark R., and Erdik M. - Preliminary analysis of the masonry of the Hagia Sophia Basilica, Istanbul,MRS Online Proc. Libr., vol. 267, 1992.

33. Maierhofer C., Leipold S., Schaurich D., Binda L., and Saisi A. - Determination of the moisture distribution in the outside walls of S. Maria Rossa using radar, In: 7th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 1998, pp. 509-514.

34. Ahmad S., Iqbal Y., and Ghani F. - Phase and Microstructure of Brick-Clay Soil and Fired Clay-Bricks From Some Areas in Peshawar Pakistan, J. Pakistan Mater. Soc. 2 (1) (2008) 33-39.

35. Morillas H., et al. - In-situ analytical study of bricks exposed to marine environment using hand-held X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and related laboratory techniques, Spectrochim. Acta - Part B At. Spectrosc., Vol. 146, 2018, pp. 28-35.

36. Bakhteri J., Makhtar A. M., and Sambasivam S. - Finite Element Modelling of Structural Clay Brick Masonry Subjected to Axial Compression, J. Teknol. 41 (2012) 57-68.

37. Fodi A. - Effects influencing the compressive strength of a solid, fired clay brick, Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng. 55 (2) (2011) 117-128.

38. Lourenco P. B., Fernandes F. M., and Castro F. - Handmade clay bricks: Chemical, physical and mechanical properties, Int. J. Archit. Herit. 4 (1) (2010) 38-58.

Downloads

Published

28-10-2024

How to Cite

[1]
Guljit Singh, Varinder Singh Kanwar, and Anshu Tomar, “Heritage clay brick characterization and assessment with compatible contemporary bricks for retrofitting of heritage monuments”, Vietnam J. Sci. Technol., vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 915–930, Oct. 2024.

Issue

Section

Materials