A systematic approach to the dilemma between flood vulnerability and resilience - Review and concepts

Hoang Cong Tri, Luc Hens, Pham Minh Thien Phuoc, Nguyen Thanh Hung, Tran Ha Phuong
Author affiliations

Authors

  • Hoang Cong Tri Representative office VAST, 01 Mac Dinh Chi street, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Luc Hens Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
  • Pham Minh Thien Phuoc Department of East Asian Economics, Ruhr Bochum Universität, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany
  • Nguyen Thanh Hung Representative office VAST, 01 Mac Dinh Chi street, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Tran Ha Phuong Ho Chi Minh City Institute of Resources Geography, VAST, 01 Mac Dinh Chi Street, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15625/2525-2518/55/5/9195

Keywords:

vulnerability, resilience, resources, stress, regime shift

Abstract

The nature of "vulnerability" is that it not only exists when elements at risk are exposed to flood, but also hides in interactions between environmental, social and economic factors before the flood incident. While ecological resilience reflects the dynamic characteristics of resources, ecological vulnerability systematically describing aspects of stress was less researched. This paper develops a concept, modeling dynamic interactions between stress and resources taking into account of context, space, time, and stakeholder involvements, to provide direct causes and solutions for flood risk management. The paper reviews three major schools of thought concerning (i) vulnerability and resilience are two sides of the same coin, (ii) resilience is a part of vulnerability, and (iii) they are two separated concepts with some overlaps. Limitations of the schools of thought were recognized based on four main criteria: (i) vulnerability and resilience must reflect all social, economic and environmental aspects, (ii) they exist regardless of hazards, (iii) they are processes than outcomes, and (iv) they entail multiple objectives. Inspired by the flipping coin and separated concepts, a new framework has been developed. It acknowledges from outstanding points of the two that vulnerability and resilience are normalized as stress and resources of the same coin. Additionally, they can generate positive and/or negative outcomes. Therefore, their relationships are complex because resources, defined by stakeholders, may prevent system changes and consequently amplify stress. Depending on the ratio between stress and resources, a system can be characterized as a 'resistant', or a 'creative' regime. If incremental disturbances exceed the recovery threshold as defined by the available data and the stakeholders, the system might change regime. Decision makers can take advantage of this framework to prepare appropriate resources that increase the resilience of the community and anticipate adverse effects for incoming floods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

20-10-2017

How to Cite

[1]
H. C. Tri, L. Hens, P. M. Thien Phuoc, N. T. Hung, and T. H. Phuong, “A systematic approach to the dilemma between flood vulnerability and resilience - Review and concepts”, Vietnam J. Sci. Technol., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 620–636, Oct. 2017.

Issue

Section

Mechanical Engineering - Mechatronics

Most read articles by the same author(s)