Prediction of soil loss due to erosion using support vector machine model


  • Van Quan Tran University of Transport Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
  • Indra Prakash Department of Science & Technology, Bhaskarcharya Institute for Space Applications and Geo-Informatics (BISAG), Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar 382002, India



soil loss, support vector machine, machine learning, partial dependence plots, soil degradation


Soil erosion refers to the detachment and removal of soil particles from land (topsoil), by the natural physical forces (water, glacier and wind). Soil erosion causes soil loss in the catchment or any land areas severely impacting agriculture activity, sedimentation in the dam reservoirs, and hampering developmental activities. Therefore, it is desirable to accurately measure soil loss due to erosion for the development and management of an area. With this objective, a well-known machine learning algorithm Support Vector Machine (SVM) has been used in the development of the soil loss prediction model. Eight erosion affecting variable inputs: ambient temperature Tair, rainfall, Antecedent Moisture Conditions (AMC), rainfall intensity, slope, vegetation cover, soil temperature Tsoil and moisture of the soil. Data on published literature was used in the model study. The accuracy of the proposed SVM was assessed by using three statistical performance evaluation indicators namely Person correlation coefficient (R), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Squared Error (MAE). Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) was used to investigate the dependence of prediction results of eight input variables used in the model study. Model validation results showed that SVM model performed well for the prediction of soil loss for testing (R = 0.8993) and also for training (R=0.9123). Rainfall intensity and vegetation cover were found to be the two most important affecting input parameters for the soil loss prediction.


Download data is not yet available.


Bissonnais Y.L., Dubreuil N., Daroussin J., 2004. Modélisation et cartographie de l’aléa d’érosion des sols à l’échelle régionale. Étude et Gestion des Sols, 16.

Borrelli P., Van Oost K., Meusburger K., Alewell C., Lugato E., Panagos P., 2018. A step towards a holistic assessment of soil degradation in Europe: Coupling on-site erosion with sediment transfer and carbon fluxes. Environ Res., 161, 291–298.

Bui D.T., Tuan T.A., Klempe H., Pradhan B., Revhaug I., 2016. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides, 13, 361–378.

Epstein E., Grant W.J., Struchtemeyer R.A., 1966. Effects of Stones on Runoff, Erosion, and Soil Moisture. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 30, 638–640.

Fox D.M., Bryan R.B., 2000. The relationship of soil loss by interrill erosion to slope gradient. Catena, 38, 211–222.

Gholami V., Booij M.J., Nikzad Tehrani E., Hadian M.A., 2018. Spatial soil erosion estimation using an artificial neural network (ANN) and field plot data. Catena, 163, 210–218.

Kinnell P.I.A., 1981. Rainfall Intensity-Kinetic Energy Relationships for Soil Loss Prediction. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 45, 153–155.

Kiran S., Lal B., Tripathy S.S., 2016. Shear Strength Prediction of Soil based on Probabilistic Neural Network. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9,

Klik A., Eitzinger J., 2010. Impact of climate change on soil erosion and the efficiency of soil conservation practices in Austria. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 148, 529–541.

Kuo Y.L., Jaksa M.B., Lyamin A.V., Kaggwa W.S., 2009. ANN-based model for predicting the bearing capacity of strip footing on multi-layered cohesive soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 36, 503–516.

Le Bissonnais Y., Montier C., Jamagne M., Daroussin J., King D., 2002. Mapping erosion risk for cultivated soil in France. Catena, 46, 207–220.

Le L.M., Ly H.-B., Pham B.T., Le V.M., Pham T.A., Nguyen D.-H., Tran X.-T., Le T.-T., 2019. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting Buckling Damage of Steel Columns Under Axial Compression. Materials, 12, 1670.

Le T.-T., Pham B.T., Ly H.-B., Shirzadi A., Le L.M., 2020. Development of 48-hour Precipitation Forecasting Model using Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Network, in: Ha-Minh, C., Dao, D.V., Benboudjema, F., Derrible, S., Huynh, D.V.K., Tang, A.M. (Eds.), CIGOS 2019, Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer Singapore, 1191–1196.

Ly H.-B., Le L.M., Duong H.T., Nguyen T.C., Pham T.A., Le T.-T., Le V.M., Nguyen-Ngoc L., Pham B.T., 2019a. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting Critical Buckling Load of Structural Members under Compression Considering the Influence of Initial Geometric Imperfections. Applied Sciences, 9, 2258.

Ly H.-B., Le L.M., Phi L.V., Phan V.-H., Tran V.Q., Pham B.T., Le T.-T., Derrible S., 2019b. Development of an AI Model to Measure Traffic Air Pollution from Multisensor and Weather Data. Sensors, 19, 4941.

Martz L.W., de Jong E., 1987. Using cesium-137 to assess the variability of net soil erosion and its association with topography in a Canadian Prairie landscape. CatenA, 14, 439–451.

McDowell R.W., Sharpley A.N., 2002. The effect of antecedent moisture conditions on sediment and phosphorus loss during overland flow: Mahantango Creek catchment, Pennsylvania, USA. Hydrological Processes, 16, 3037–3050.

Nearing M.A., Govers G., Norton L.D., 1999. Variability in Soil Erosion Data from Replicated Plots. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63, 1829–1835.

PengT., Wang S., 2012. Effects of land use, land cover and rainfall regimes on the surface runoff and soil loss on karst slopes in southwest China. Catena, 90, 53–62.

Pham B.T., Le L.M., Le T.-T., Bui K.-T.T., Le V.M., Ly H.-B., Prakash I., 2020. Development of advanced artificial intelligence models for daily rainfall prediction. Atmospheric Research, 237, 104845.

Qi C., Ly H.-B., Chen Q., Le T.-T., Le V.M., Pham B.T., 2019. Flocculation-dewatering prediction of fine mineral tailings using a hybrid machine learning approach. Chemosphere, 125450.

Samui P., 2008. Prediction of friction capacity of driven piles in clay using the support vector machine. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45, 288–295.

Thanh T.T.M., Ly H.-B., Pham B.T., 2020. A Possibility of AI Application on Mode-choice Prediction of Transport Users in Hanoi, in: CIGOS 2019, Innovation for Sustainable Infrastructure, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer, Singapore, 1179–1184.

Vapnik V., 1999. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, 2nd edition. ed. Springer, New York.

Vapnik V., Chapelle O., 2000. Bounds on error expectation for support vector machines. Neural Computation, 12, 2013–2036.

Wang G., Wente S., Gertner G.Z., Anderson A., 2002. Improvement in mapping vegetation cover factor for the universal soil loss equation by geostatistical methods with Landsat Thematic Mapper images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 3649–3667.

Wischmeier W.H., Smith D.D., 1958. Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 39, 285–291.

Wu Y., Ouyang W., Hao Z., Lin C., Liu H., Wang Y., 2018. Assessment of soil erosion characteristics in response to temperature and precipitation in a freeze-thaw watershed. Geoderma, 328, 56–65.




How to Cite

Tran, V. Q., & Prakash, I. (2020). Prediction of soil loss due to erosion using support vector machine model. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 42(3), 247–254.

Most read articles by the same author(s)