Vol. 31 No. 3 (2021)
Invited Papers

Normed Division Algebras Application to the Monopole Physics

Dai-Nam Le
\(^1\)Department of Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 227 Nguyen Van Cu Street, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;<br> \(^2\)Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam;<br>\(^3\)Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics Research Group, Advanced Institute of Materials Science, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; <br>\(^4\)Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, 19 Nguyen Huu Tho, District 7, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Van-Hoang Le
Ho Chi Minh City University of Education

Published 16-04-2021

Keywords

  • Levi-Civita transformation,
  • harmonic oscillator,
  • MICZ-Kepler problem,
  • duality,
  • Dirac,
  • Yang,
  • and SO(8) monopoles,
  • nine-dimensional space,
  • octonion
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Le, D.-N., & Le, V.-H. (2021). Normed Division Algebras Application to the Monopole Physics. Communications in Physics, 31(3), 235. https://doi.org/10.15625/0868-3166/15905

Abstract

We review some normed division algebras (R, C, H, O)  applications to the monopole physics and MICZ-Kepler problems. More specifically, we will briefly review some results in applying the normed division algebras to interpret the existence of Dirac, Yang, and SO(8) monopoles. These monopoles also appear during the examination of the duality between isotropic harmonic oscillators and the MICZ-Kepler problems. We also revisit some of our newest results in the nine-dimensional MICZ-Kepler problem using the generalized Hurwitz transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. P. A. M. Dirac,Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences133(1931)60.
  2. H. Hopf,Mathematische Annalen104(1931) 637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01457962
  3. H. Hopf,Fundam. Math.25(1935) 427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-25-1-427-440
  4. J. Baez,Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society39(2002) 145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-01-00934-X
  5. T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang,Phys. Rev. D12(1975) 3845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.12.3845
  6. C. N. Yang,J. Math. Phys.19(1978) 320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1157.1978.tb04495.x
  7. C. N. Yang,Physics Today67(2014) 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.2585
  8. B. Grossman, T. W. Kephart and J. D. Stasheff,Commun. Math. Phys.96(1984) 431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01212529
  9. S.-C. Zhang and J. Hu,Science294(2001) 823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.294.5543.823
  10. B. A. Bernevig, J. Hu, N. Toumbas and S.-C. Zhang,Phys. Rev. Lett.91(2003) 236803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.236803
  11. V.-H. Le, T.-S. Nguyen and N.-H. Phan,J. Phys. A Math. Theor.42(2009) 175204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/17/175204
  12. V.-H. Le and T.-S. Nguyen,J. Math. Phys.52(2011) 032105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3567422
  13. R. B. Laughlin,Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1395
  14. C. Furey,Physics Letters B785(2018) 84 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.08.032
  15. L. Boyle and S. Farnsworth,New Journal of Physics22(2020) 073023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab9709
  16. D. Bergmann and Y. Frishman,J. Math. Phys.6(1965) 1855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1704733
  17. D. Zwanziger,Physical Review176(1968) 1480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.176.1480
  18. H. V. McIntosh and A. Cisneros,J. Math. Phys.11(1970) 896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665227
  19. L. G. Mardoyan, A. N. Sissakian and V. M. Ter-Antonyan,8D oscillator as a hidden SU(2) - monopole, 1997.
  20. I. Bars and J. L. Rosner,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53(2020) 234001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ab87ba
  21. T. Levi-Civita, Acta Mathematica 30 (1906) 305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418577
  22. P. Kustaanheimo and E. Stiefel, Journal f¨ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 218 (1965) 204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1965.218.204
  23. M. Kibler, A. Ronveaux and T. N´egadi, J. Math. Phys. 27 (1986) 1541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.527064
  24. V.-H. Le and L. I. Komarov, Phy. Lett. A 177 (1993) 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(93)90520-A
  25. A. Hurwitz, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G¨ottingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse (1898) 309.
  26. S. Okubo, Introduction to octonion and other non-associative algebras in physics, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524479
  27. J. A. Nieto and L. N. Alejo-Armenta, International Journal of Modern Physics A 16 (2001) 4207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X01005213
  28. D. W. Lyons, Mathematics Magazine 76 (2003) 87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.2003.11953158
  29. K. Hasebe, Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 6 (2010) 071.
  30. V.-H. Le, T. J. Viloria and A.-T. Le, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 24 (1991) 3021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/24/13/017
  31. L. Davtyan, L. Mardoyan, G. Pogosyan, A. Sissakian and V. Ter-Antonyan, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 20 (1987) 6121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/20/17/044
  32. D. Lambert and M. Kibler, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 21 (1988) 307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/21/2/012
  33. A. Trautman, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 16 (1977) 561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01811088
  34. L. H. Ryder, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 13 (1980) 437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/13/2/012
  35. F. Cooper, A. Khare and U. P. Sukhatme, Supersymmetry in quantum mechanics, World Scientific, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/4687
  36. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, series, and products, Academic press, 2014.
  37. M. M. Nieto, Am. J. Phys. 47 (1979) 1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.11976
  38. I. Mladenov and V. Tsanov, Journal of Geometry and Physics 2 (1985) 17 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0393-0440(85)90016-6
  39. V. Aquilanti, S. Cavalli and C. Coletti, Chem. Phys. 214 (1997) 1 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0104(96)00310-2
  40. S. M. Al-Jaber, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 37 (1998) 1289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026679921970
  41. G. Meng, J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007) 032105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2712420
  42. G. Meng, Phys. At. Nucl. 71 (2008) 946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778808050256
  43. G. Meng, J. London Math. Soc. 81 (2010) 663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/jdq019
  44. G. Meng and R. Zhang, J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011) 042106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3574886
  45. H. Kleinert, Group dynamics of the hydrogen atom, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1968.
  46. C. Pedder, J. Sonner and D. Tong, Journal of High Energy Physics 2008 (2008) 065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/065
  47. A. Cisneros and H. V. McIntosh, J. Math. Phys. 10 (1969) 277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1664843
  48. D.-N. Le, N.-T. D. Hoang and V.-H. Le, J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017) 042102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4979618
  49. D.-N. Le, N.-T. D. Hoang and V.-H. Le, J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) 032101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4997532
  50. L. D. Nam, P. A. Luan, L. P. Su and P. N. Hung, HCMUE Journal of Science: Natural Sciences and Technology 16 (2019) 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.16.3.2456(2019)
  51. J. Moser, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 23 (1970) 609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160230406
  52. M. Boiteux, Physica 65 (1973) 381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(73)90353-4
  53. M. Boiteux, J. Math. Phys. 23 (1982) 1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525515
  54. A. O. Barut, C. K. E. Schneider and R. Wilson, J. Math. Phys. 20 (1979) 2244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.524005
  55. T. Iwai and Y. Uwano, J. Math. Phys. 27 (1986) 1523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.527112
  56. A. O. Barut and G. L. Bornzin, J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665653
  57. S. Bellucci, S. Krivonos and V. Ohanyan, Physical Review D 76 (2007) 105023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.105023
  58. I. Marquette, J. Math. Phys. 51 (2010) 102105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3496900
  59. L. G. Mardoyan, Phys. At. Nucl. 68 (2005) 1746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.2121925
  60. L. Mardoyan, A. Nersessian and A. Yeranyan, Phy. Lett. A 366 (2007) 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2007.01.049
  61. M. V. Pletyukhov and E. A. Tolkachev, J. Math. Phys. 40 (1999) 93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.532761
  62. L. G. Mardoyan, A. N. Sissakian and V. M. Ter-Antonyan, Modern Phy. Lett. A 14 (1999) 1303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732399001395
  63. M. V. Pletyukhov and E. A. Tolkachev, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 32 (1999) L249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/32/23/101
  64. I. Marquette, J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012) 022103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3684955
  65. M. F. Hoque, I. Marquette and Y.-Z. Zhang, Annals of Physics 380 (2017) 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2017.03.003
  66. L. G. Mardoyan, A. N. Sisakyan and V. M. Ter-Antonyan, Theor. Math. Phys. 123 (2000) 451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551051
  67. M. V. Pletyukhov and E. A. Tolkachev, J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000) 187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.533128
  68. L. D. Nam and L. V. Hoang, Octonionic representation of the nine-dimensional Micz-Kepler problem, The 41st Vietnam National Conference on Theoretical Physics, 2016.
  69. T.-S. Nguyen, D.-N. Le, T.-Q. N. Thoi and V.-H. Le, J. Math. Phys. 56 (2015) 052103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4921171
  70. N.-H. Phan, D.-N. Le, T.-Q. N. Thoi and V.-H. Le, J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) 032102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4997693
  71. D.-N. Le, N.-H. Phan, T.-Q. N. Thoi and V.-H. Le, J. Math. Phys. 60 (2019) 062102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5051787
  72. D.-N. Le and V.-H. Le, J. Math. Phys. (2021) submitted.
  73. V.-H. Le, T.-T. Phan and C.-T. Truong, J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011) 072101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3606515
  74. N.-H. Phan and V.-H. Le, J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012) 082103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4740514
  75. T. Kereselidze, G. Chkadua and J. F. Ogilvie, GESJ: Physics 2 (2016) 44.