Modeling effects of abiotic and anthropogenic factors to rice production - A case study in Sapa district, Lao Cai province, Vietnam
Keywords:Rice production, topology, hydrology, human, semi-structured interview, multiple linear regression, InVEST, Sapa
The famous terraced rice ecosystem in the mountainous areas as Sapa of northern Vietnam has expanded with unstable productivity over generations. However, the question arises of how natural and human conditions on terraces can boost the quality of rice provisioning ecosystem service supply with rice yields as an indicator. The study used a semi-structured interview method, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) tool and general linear models to investigate the influence of natural and human-derived components on the rice provisioning service at six villages. The results showed that along with the importance of applying a fertilizer-based system in the terraced rice ecosystem, topology- and hydrology-based systems have been influencing significantly on water and nutrient supply for irrigation on terraced rice fields. Moreover, analyzing the natural components has been considered more efficient than human-derived components for a sustainable rice ecosystem. The results indicated that the high potential of rice provisioning service supply had found at the downstream of Ta Van sub-catchment and the Vu Lung Sung village where the distance from paddy fields to sinks or outlet of streams is lower than five kilometers. The last result of the synthetic model proving 74.28 percent of deviance of terraced rice production did not avoid many noises in collecting and standardizing data that also discuss in this study.
Abdullah A., Ito S., Adhana K., 2006. Estimate of rice consumption in Asian countries and the world towards 2050. Proceedings for Workshop and Conference on Rice in the World at Stake, 2, 28–43.
Aho K., Derryberry D., Peterson T., 2014. Model selection for ecologists: The worldviews of AIC and BIC. Ecology, 95, 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1452.1
Albizua A., Williams A., Hedlund K., Pascual U., 2015. Crop rotations including ley and manure can promote ecosystem services in conventional farming systems. Appl. Soil Ecol., 95, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.003.
Burkhard B., Kandziora M., Hou Y., Müller F., 2014. Ecosystem Service Potentials, Flows and Demands – Concepts for Spatial Localisation, Indication and Quantification. Landsc. Online, 32, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201434.
Burkhard B., Müller A., Müller F., Grescho V., Anh Q., Arida G., Bustamante J.V., Van Chien H., Heong K.L., Escalada M., Marquez L., Thanh Truong D., Villareal S., Settele J., 2015. Land cover-based ecosystem service assessment of irrigated rice cropping systems in southeast Asia-An explorative study. Ecosyst. Serv. 14, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.005
Dawe D., 2010. The rice crisis: market, policies and food security, The Rice Crisis: Markets, Policies and Food Security. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Earthscan. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776684.
FAO, 2000. Bridging the rice yield gap in the Asia-Pacific Region, Food and Agriculture Organization. FAO.
Frimawaty E., Basukriadi A., Syamsu J.A., Soesilo T.E.B., 2013. Sustainability of Rice Farming based on Eco-Farming to Face Food Security and Climate Change: Case Study in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Procedia Environ. Sci., 17, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.011.
Glavan M., Pintar M., Urbanc J., 2014. Spatial variation of crop rotations and their impacts on provisioning ecosystem services on the river Drava alluvial plain. Sustain. Water Qual. Ecol., 5, 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.01.004.
Gupta P.C., Toole J.C.O., 1986. Upland Rice: A Global Perspective. International rice research institute, Philippines.
Herdt R.W., Capule C., 1983. Adoption, spread and production impact of modern rice varieties in Asia, IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines.
Hoang H.T.T., 2014. Multi-scale Analysis of Human-Environment Interactions. A Case-study in the Northern Vietnamese Mountains. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
IRRI, 2006. The sustainability of rice farming, International Rice Research Institute, CAB International Publishing. International rice research institute, Philippines. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.35-3847.
IRRI, 1985. Progress in upland rice research, Progress in upland rice research. The International Rice Research Institute, P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.
IRRI, 1982. Rice research strategies for the future. International rice research institute, Philippines.
Jones L., Norton L., Austin Z., Browne A.L., Donovan D., Emmett B.A., Grabowski Z.J., Howard D.C., Jones J.P.G., Kenter J.O., Manley W., Morris C., Robinson D.A., Short C., Siriwardena G.M., Stevens C.J., Storkey J., Waters R.D., Willis G.F., 2016. Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services. Land use policy, 52, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.014
Kandziora M., Burkhard B., Müller F., 2013. Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. Ecosyst. Serv., 4, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.001.
Khush G., Virk P., 2005. IR varieties and their impact. International rice research institute, Los Baños, Philippines.
Lewandowski C.M., 2013. FAO STATISTICAL YEARBOOK. World Food and Agriculture, The effects of brief mindfulness intervention on acute pain experience: An examination of individual difference.
Li F.B., Lu G. De, Zhou X.Y., Ni H.X., Xu C.C., Yue C., Yang X.M., Feng J.F., Fang F.P., 2015. Elevation and Land Use Types Have Significant Impacts on Spatial Variability of Soil Organic Matter Content in Hani Terraced Field of Yuanyang County, China. Rice Sci., 22, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2015.05.005.
MEA, 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Millenium Ecosytem Assess, 1–25.
Meylan L., Merot A., Gary C., Rapidel B., 2013. Combining a typology and a conceptual model of cropping system to explore the diversity of relationships between ecosystem services: The case of erosion control in coffee-based agroforestry systems in Costa Rica. Agric. Syst., 118, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.02.002
Posner S., Verutes G., Koh I., Denu D., Ricketts T., 2016. Global use of ecosystem service models. Ecosyst. Serv., 17, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.003
Power A.G., 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 365, 2959–2971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
Raffaelli D., White P.C.L., 2013. Ecosystems and Their Services in a Changing World. An Ecological Perspective, 1st ed, Advances in Ecological Research. Elsevier Ltd.
Remme R.P., Schrueter M., Hein L., 2014. Developing spatial biophysical accounting for multiple ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv., 10, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.006.
Schmitter P., Dercon G., Hilger T., Thi Le Ha T., Huu Thanh N., Lam N., Duc Vien T., Cadisch G., 2010. Sediment induced soil spatial variation in paddy fields of Northwest Vietnam. Geoderma, 155, 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.12.014.
Slaets J.I.F., Schmitter P., Hilger T., Vien T.D., Cadisch G., 2015. Sediment trap efficiency of paddy fields at the watershed scale in a mountainous catchment in Northwest Vietnam. Biogeosciences Discuss., 12, 20437–20473. https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-12-20437-2015.
Vigerstol K.L., Aukema J.E., 2011. A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. J. Environ. Manage., 92, 2403–2409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040.
Wischmeier W.H., Smith D.D., 1958. Rainfall energy and its relation to soil loss. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 285–291.
Wu Y., Chen J., 2013. Estimating irrigation water demand using an improved method and optimizing reservoir operation for water supply and hydropower generation: A case study of the Xinfengjiang reservoir in southern China. Agric. Water Manag., 116, 110–121.