Estimating Hull Resistance of a Pontoon by using CFD

He Van Ngo; Cong Liem Hoang; Van Hien Ngo

doi:10.15625/1859-3097/17157

Author affiliations

Authors

Ngo Van He Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
Hoang Cong Liem Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
Ngo Van Hien Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15625/1859-3097/17157

Keywords:

Hull, resistance, CFD, pontoon, empirical formulae.

Abstract

This paper presents our estimated results of hull resistance acting on a full-scale pontoon by a commercial Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD). The results have been compared with those obtained by using various well-established valuable empirical formulae introduced by the International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC). The differences between the empirical formulae and the CFD results have been found and discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Clements, R. E., 1959. An analysis of ship model correlation data using the 1957 ITTC line. National Physical Laboratory, NPL, Published by: The Institution of Naval Architects, 101(4), London, RINA Transactions 1959-19.

Froude, W., 1872. Experiments on the surface-friction experienced by a plane moving through water. British Association for the Advancement of Science, 42, 118–124.

Froude, W., 1874. Report to the lords commissioners of the admiralty on experiments for the determination of the frictional resistance of water on a surface, under various conditions, performed at Chelston cross, under the authority of their lordships. Taylor & Francis. 14 p.

Holtrop, J., and Mennen, G. G. J., 1982. An approximate power prediction method. International Shipbuilding Progress, 29(335), 166–170.

ITTC, R. P., 2002. Guidelines: Testing and Extrapolation Methods: Resistance-Uncertainty Analysis, Example for Resistance Test. ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, Procedure, 7-5.

Lackenby, H., 1954. On the presentation of ship resistance data. British Shipbuilding Research Association, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, RINA Transactions: 1954-19, Written Discussion.

Liu, S., and Papanikolaou, A., 2019. Approximation of the added resistance of ships with small draft or in ballast condition by empirical formula. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 233(1), 27–40.

Peck, R. W., 1976. The determination of appendage resistance of surface ships. Admiralty Experiment Works, Haslar, AEW Technical Memorandum 76020.

Shaher Sabit, A., 1971. Regression analysis of the resistance results of the BSRA series. International Shipbuilding Progress, 18(197), 3–17.

Feng, D., Ye, B., Zhang, Z., and Wang, X., 2020. Numerical Simulation of the Ship Resistance of KCS in Different Water Depths for Model-Scale and Full-Scale. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(10), 745. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100745 https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100745">

Mikkelsen, H., and Walther, J. H., 2020. Effect of roughness in full-scale validation of a CFD model of self-propelled ships. Applied Ocean Research, 99, 102162.

Niklas, K., and Pruszko, H., 2019. Full-scale CFD simulations for the determination of ship resistance as a rational, alternative method to towing tank experiments. Ocean Engineering, 190, 106435.

Samuel, S., Iqbal, M., and Utama, I. K. A. P., 2015. An investigation into the resistance components of converting a traditional monohull fishing vessel into catamaran form. International Journal of Technology, 6(3), 432–441.

Seo, J. H., Seol, D. M., Lee, J. H., and Rhee, S. H., 2010. Flexible CFD meshing strategy for prediction of ship resistance and propulsion performance. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2(3), 139–145.

Tu, T. N., Kraskowski, M., Chien, N. M., Anh, V. T., Luu, D. L., and Phuong, N. K., 2018. Numerical study on the influence of trim on ship resistance in trim optimization process. Naval Engineers Journal, 130(4), 133–142.

Rahaman, M. M., Islam, H., Islam, M. T., and Khondoker, M. R. H., 2017. Calm water resistance prediction of a bulk carrier using Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes based solver. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1919(1), 020038).

Seok, J., and Park, J. C., 2020. Comparative study of air resistance with and without a superstructure on a container ship using numerical simulation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(4), 267.

Ngo, V. H., and Le, T. T., 2020. Effect of mesh on CFD aerodynamic performances of a container ship. Vietnam Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 20(3), 343–353.

Van He, N., and Ikeda, Y., 2013. Optimization of bow shape for a non ballast water ship. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 12(3), 251–260.

He, N. V., and Ikeda, Y., 2014. Added resistance acting on hull of a non ballast water ship. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 13(1), 11–22.

Van He, N., Mizutani, K., and Ikeda, Y., 2016. Reducing air resistance acting on a ship by using interaction effects between the hull and accommodation. Ocean Engineering, 111, 414–423.

Van, H. N., and Van, T. T., 2021. CFD investigation of interaction effect between hull and accommodation on wind drag of a container ship in head wind. Vietnam Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 21(1), 37–46.

Le, T. K., He, N. V., Hien, N. V., and Bui, N. T., 2021. Effects of a bulbous bow shape on added resistance acting on the hull of a ship in regular head wave. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(6), 559.

Molland, A. F., Turnock, S. R., and Hudson, D. A., 2017. Ship resistance and propulsion. Cambridge university press.

Schoenherr, K. E., 1932. Resistance of flat surfaces moving through a fluid. Trans. Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng., 40, 279–313.