Determination of the constant Wo for local geoid of Vietnam and it’s systematic deviation from the global geoid
Author affiliations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15625/1859-3097/17/4B/13001Keywords:
The geoid, Stokes constants, Bruns fomular, Neyman boundary problem.Abstract
Constant Wo, defining the geoid, has important applications in the area of physical geodesy. With the development of artificial Earth satellite, constant Wo for the global geoid approximating the oceans on Earth can be calculated from an expansion of spherical harmonics - Stokes constants determined by observation of perturbations in artificial satellite’s orbits. However, the Stokes constants are limited, therefore the geoid constant Wo could not be calculated for local geoid (state geoid) from the mentioned expansion of spherical harmonics. In this paper, we present a method to determine the constant Wo for local geoid of Vietnam, using generalized Bruns formula and Neyman boundary problem. The initial data used are Faye gravity anomalies surveyed on land and sea of Southern Vietnam. The constant Wo is then used to calculate the systematic deviation of the local geoid of Vietnam from the global geoid EGM - 96.Downloads
Metrics
References
Kaula, W. M., 1967. Theory of Satellite Geodesy (Blaisdell, Waltham, MA, 1966). Google Scholar.
Kaula, W. M., 1987. 13. Satellite Measurement of the Earth's Gravity Field. In Methods in Experimental Physics (Vol. 24, pp. 163-187). Academic Press.
Lan, P. H., Neyman ,Yu. M., 2010. Local quasigeoid and global quasigeoid. Journal of Geology, Vienam Academy of Science and Technology.
Nghia H, H., 2003. Determination of geoid surface and deflection of plumb-line by gravity anomaly according to satellite data, PhD Thesis, University of Science, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City.
Lan, P. H., Neyman, Yu. M., Sugaipova, I. S., 2013. Evaluating the displacement of local quasigeoid relative to global quasigeoid at the tide gauge Hon Dau. Journal of Mining and Geology, Vol. 41.
Bursa, M., and Pec, K., 1993. Gravity field and dynamics of the earth. Berlin, New York: Springer, c1993.
Vaníček, P., Kingdon, R., and Santos, M., 2012. Geoid versus quasigeoid: a case of physics versus geometry. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 42(1), 101-118.
Shinbirev, B. P., 1975. Theory of the shape of the earth. Moscow Izdatel Nedra.