Efficiency of using probiotic Elac-grow and Han-proway in laying-egg hens

Dinh Thi Tuyet Van; Nguyen Thi Thu; Nguyen Hong Linh; Nguyen Thi Men; Tran Van Khanh; Le Thi Nhi Cong

doi:10.15625/1811-4989/16075

Author affiliations

Authors

Dinh Thi Tuyet Van Hanvet Pharmaceutical Limited Company, Pho Noi Industrial Park A, Ban-Yen Nhan, My Hao District, Hungyen Province, Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Thu Hanvet Pharmaceutical Limited Company, Pho Noi Industrial Park A, Ban-Yen Nhan, My Hao District, Hungyen Province, Vietnam
Nguyen Hong Linh Hanvet Pharmaceutical Limited Company, Pho Noi Industrial Park A, Ban-Yen Nhan, My Hao District, Hungyen Province, Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Men Hanvet Pharmaceutical Limited Company, Pho Noi Industrial Park A, Ban-Yen Nhan, My Hao District, Hungyen Province, Vietnam
Tran Van Khanh Hanvet Pharmaceutical Limited Company, Pho Noi Industrial Park A, Ban-Yen Nhan, My Hao District, Hungyen Province, Vietnam
Le Thi Nhi Cong Institute of Biotechnology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Cau Giay District, Hanoi, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15625/1811-4989/16075

Keywords:

Ammonia value, Elac-grow, Egg yield, Egg quality, Han-proway, Probiotic

Abstract

Industrial chicken farm has to face many challenges such as epidermis and environmental pollution. Antibiotics and synthetic antimicrobial agents are routinely used to alleviate stress as well as to elevate growth and feed efficiency. However, using antibiotic had many negative effects, especially antibiotic resistance; therefore, probiotic products are a bio-secure solution being popularly applied in livestock husbandry. The study was carried out on the two probiotics Elac-grow, a diet supplement, and Han-proway, a waste treatment product, in industrial egg-laying hens. There were two lodgings (test and control) in these experiments; each had 4000 23-week-old hens of Hyline breed. Two probiotics were applied to the test and none to the control. The results showed that there was not significantly difference of egg yield between the two groups, although, the test lodging had higher egg yield growing ratio (67.48%) than the control one (65.73%). Egg quality in the experimental lodging was also significantly improved in the damaged egg ratio, the egg weight and the egg yolk weight after using Elac-grow. The efficiency of using Elac-grow and Han-proway was also shown through the concentration of ammonia emission in animal lodging. The ammonia value of the test lodging was maximum 5 ppm and remained stable at this point, lower than of the control. This efficiency was shown significantly in the microbial fluctuation analysis, when the total bacteria and coliform counts were reduced in the test lodging sequentially above 1x10⁸CFU bacteria/g and above 1x10⁷CFU coliform/g, the control had uptrend sequentially above 2x10⁹CFU bacteria/g and above 1x10⁸CFU coliform/g.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AFRC, R. FULLER. 1989. “Probiotics in Man and Animals.” Journal of Applied Bacteriology 66 (5): 365–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.1989.66.issue-5.

Applegate, T. J., V. Klose, T. Steiner, A. Ganner, and G. Schatzmayr. 2010. “Probiotics and Phytogenics for Poultry: Myth or Reality?” Journal of Applied Poultry Research 19 (2): 194–210. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00168.

Balevi, T., U. S.U. An, B. Coskun, V. Kurtoglu, and I. S. Etingül. 2001. “Effect of Dietary Probiotic on Performance and Humoral Immune Response.” British Poultry Science 42 (4): 456–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120073133.

Dhama, K., Vinay Verma, P. Sawant, Ruchi Tiwari, R. Vaid, and R. Chauhan. 2011. “Applications of Probiotics in Poultry: Enhancing Immunity and Beneficial Effects on Production Performances and Health - A Review.” Journal of Immunology and Immunopathology 13 (1): 1–19.

Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah, and S. Jalaludin. 1997. “Probiotics in Poultry: Modes of Action.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 53 (4): 362–68. https://doi.org/10.1079/wps19970028.

Kurtoglu, V., F. Kurtoglu, E. Seker, B. Coskun, T. Balevi, and E. S. Polat. 2004. “Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Laying Hen Diets on Yield Performance and Serum and Egg Yolk Cholesterol.” Food Additives and Contaminants 21 (9): 817–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030310001639530.

Miles, D. M., S. L. Branton, and B. D. Lott. 2004. “Atmospheric Ammonia Is Detrimental to the Performance of Modern Commercial Broilers.” Poultry Science 83 (10): 1650–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.10.1650.

Nahashon, S. N., H. S. Nakaue, S. P. Snyder, and L. W. Mirosh. 1994. “Performance of Single Comb White Leghorn Layers Fed Corn-Soybean Meal and Barley-Corn-Soybean Meal Diets Supplemented with a Direct-Fed Microbial.” Poultry Science 73 (11): 1712–23. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0731712.

Nahashon, Samuel N., Harry S. Nakaue, and Larry W. Mirosh. 1996a. “Nutrient Retention and Production Parameters of Single Comb White Leghorn Layers Fed Diets with Varying Crude Protein Levels and Supplemented with Direct-Fed Microbials.” Animal Feed Science and Technology 61 (1–4): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(96)00956-X.

Nahashon, Samuel N., Harry S. Nakaue, and Larry W. Mirosh. 1996b. “Performance of Single Comb White Leghorn Fed a Diet Supplemented with a Live Microbial during the Growth and Egg Laying Phases.” Animal Feed Science and Technology 57 (1–2): 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00852-7.

Park, J. W., J. S. Jeong, S. I. Lee, and I. H. Kim. 2016. “Management and Production: Effect of Dietary Supplementation with a Probiotic (Enterococcus Faecium) on Production Performance, Excreta Microflora, Ammonia Emission, and Nutrient Utilization in ISA Brown Laying Hens.” Poultry Science 95 (12): 2829–35. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew241.

Patterson, J. A., and K. M. Burkholder. 2003. “Application of Prebiotics and Probiotics in Poultry Production.” Poultry Science 82 (4): 627–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.4.627.

QCVN01-15: 2010/BNNPTNT: National Technical Regulation Conditions for biosecurity of poultry farms do Cục Chăn nuôi chủ trì biên soạn, Vụ Khoa học, Công nghệ và Môi trường trình duyệt và được ban hành theo Thông tư số 04/2010/TT-BNNPTNT ngày 15 tháng 01 năm 2010 của Bộ Nông nghiệp và Phát triển nông thôn.

Song, Z. T., X. F. Dong, J. M. Tong, and Z. H. Wang. 2012. “Effects of Waste Vinegar Residue on Nutrient Digestibility and Nitrogen Balance in Laying Hens.” Livestock Science 150 (1–3): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.08.004.

Tahseen Aziz, Rollins Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and Dr. H. John Barnes, College of Veterinary Medicine, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA (2010). https://www.poultryworld.net/Breeders/Health/2010/10/Harmful-effects-of-ammonia-on-birds-WP008071W

Tortuero, F., and E. Fernández. 1995. “Effects of Inclusion of Microbial Cultures in Barley-Based Diets Fed to Laying Hens.” Animal Feed Science and Technology 53 (3–4): 255–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00747-W.

Wathes, C M, and H H Kristensen. 2000. “Ammonia and Poultry Welfare : A Review.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 56 (September): 236–45.

Zhang, Yaowen, Wenfeng Ma, Zhidan Zhang, Fangyuan Liu, Jie Wang, Yulong Yin, and Zhanbin Wang. 2019. “Effects of Enterococcus Faecalis on Egg Production, Egg Quality and Caecal Microbiota of Hens during the Late Laying Period.” Archives of Animal Nutrition 73 (3): 208–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2019.1591128.