An in-depth study of substrate effect on the performance of BOD sensor type microbial fuel cell

Authors

  • Nguyen Thi My Linh GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE) and Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, 334 Nguyen Trai Road, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • Pham The Hai GREENLAB, Center for Life Science Research (CELIFE) and Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, 334 Nguyen Trai Road, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15625/1811-4989/16056

Keywords:

microbial fuel cell, BOD sensor, substrate, operating parameters, wastewater

Abstract

Nowadays, instant assessment of the organic content in wastewater is an urgent requirement to reduce water pollution. Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) can be used as effective biosensors for rapidly measuring BOD concentration of wastewater. However, wastewaters from different sources may consist of diverse chemical components, which may affect the BOD-measuring performance of MFC-type biosensors. Therefore, in this research, we tested different input substrates for the BOD sensor type MFC (MFC_BOD) to investigate their effects on the performance of the MFC. The substrates belonging to diverse groups such as carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids and some chlorinated compounds (xenobiotics) were tested at different concentrations equivalent to BOD levels from 10 to 200 mg L-1. Concurrently, we also analyzed the alteration of the bacterial community in the anode of the MFC when tested with those different substrates by using PCR-DGGE. Our results showed that the MFC_BOD could have linear current-to-BOD responses (with the respective R2 values >0.9) to more metabolizable substrates such as carbohydrates, organic acid and glycerol; while it responded less sensitively at different degrees to some amino acids (serine, threonine and methionine) and did not respond to chloroform and chlorobenzene (chlorinated compounds). PCA and bacterial community analysis results surprisingly imply that such different responses may be solely due to different bio(electro)chemical processes associated with the substrates but not due to changes in the composition of the bacterial community. The results suggest that, to enable the MFC_BOD to accurately sense the BODs of the wastewaters containing recalcitrant or toxic substrates, special procedures are required to enrich in the anode the bacterial communities acclimated to the substrates right from the beginning

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R. M. ; Bennetto, H. P. 1993. “Microbial Fuel Cells: Electricity Production from Carbohydrates.” Applied Biochemistry And Biotechnology 37(39/40): 27–40.

Chang, In Seop et al. 2004. “Continuous Determination of Biochemical Oxygen Demand Using Microbial Fuel Cell Type Biosensor.” Biosensors and Bioelectronics 19(6): 607–13.

Do, Minh Hang et al. 2020. “Microbial Fuel Cell-Based Biosensor for Online Monitoring Wastewater Quality: A Critical Review.” Science of the Total Environment 712: 135612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135612.

Feng, Yujie, Xin Wang, Bruce E. Logan, and He Lee. 2008. “Brewery Wastewater Treatment Using Air-Cathode Microbial Fuel Cells.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 78(5): 873–80.

Ghoreyshi, A.A., T. Jafary, G.D. Najafpour, and F. Haghparast. 2011. “Effect of Type and Concentration of Substrate on Power Generation in a Dual Chambered Microbial Fuel Cell.” Proceedings of the World Renewable Energy Congress – Sweden, 8–13 May, 2011, Linköping, Sweden 57(November): 1174–81.

Haandel A., L. J. 2007. “Handbook of Biological Waste Water Treatment.” In Quist Publishing, 7–13.

Hsieh, Min Chi, Chiu Yu Cheng, Man Hai Liu, and Ying Chien Chung. 2015. “Effects of Operating Parameters on Measurements of Biochemical Oxygen Demand Using a Mediatorless Microbial Fuel Cell Biosensor.” Sensors (Switzerland) 16(1): 1–10.

Karube, Isao, Tadashi Matsunaga, Shinya Tsuru, and Shuichi Suzuki. 1977. “Biochemical Fuel Cell Utilizing Immobilized Cells of Clostridium Butyricum.” Biotechnology and Bioengineering 19(11): 1727–33.

Kim, Byung Hong et al. 2003. “Novel BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand) Sensor Using Mediator-Less Microbial Fuel Cell.” Biotechnology Letters 25(7): 541–45.

Kim, Byung Hong, Hyung Joo Kim, Moon Sik Hyun, and Doo Hyun Park. 1999. “Direct Electrode Reaction of Fe(III)-Reducing Bacterium, Shewanella Putrefaciens.” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 9(2): 127–31.

Kim, Jung Rae, Sok Hee Jung, John M. Regan, and Bruce E. Logan. 2007. “Electricity Generation and Microbial Community Analysis of Alcohol Powered Microbial Fuel Cells.” Bioresource Technology 98(13): 2568–77.

Liu, Hong, Ramanathan Ramnarayanan, and Bruce E. Logan. 2004. “Production of Electricity during Wastewater Treatment Using a Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell.” Environmental Science and Technology 38(7): 2281–85.

Logan, Bruce E. et al. 2005. “Electricity Generation from Cysteine in a Microbial Fuel Cell.” Water Research 39(5): 942–52.

———. 2008. Microbial Fuel Cells Microbial Fuel Cells. Hoboken: NJ John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Di Lorenzo, Mirella, Tom P. Curtis, Ian M. Head, and Keith Scott. 2009. “A Single-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell as a Biosensor for Wastewaters.” Water Research 43(13): 3145–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.01.005.

Lu, Na et al. 2009. “Electricity Generation from Starch Processing Wastewater Using Microbial Fuel Cell Technology.” Biochemical Engineering Journal 43(3): 246–51.

Madigan, M. T., Martinko, J., & Parker, J. 2004. Brock Biology of Microorganisms (10 ed.). NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

Muyzer, G., de Waal, E. C., & Uitterlinden, A. 1993. Profiling of complex microbial populations using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59, 695-700.

Nguyen, T. T., Luong, T. T. T., Tran, P. H. N., Bui, H. T. V., Nguyen, H. Q., Dinh, H. T., et al. 2015. A lithotrophic microbial fuel cell operated with pseudomonads-dominated iron-oxidizing bacteria enriched at the anode. Microbial Biotechnology, 8, 579-589. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12267

Nong, Minh Tuan et al. 2014. “Optimization of The Design of A Microbial Fuel Cell for Use As A Biosensor Monitoring The Quality of Wastewater.” Vnu Journal Of Science: Natural Sciences And Technology 30(3): 285–94.

Sambrook, Joseph, and David W. Russell. 2006. “Purification of Nucleic Acids by Extraction with Phenol:Chloroform.” Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2006(1): pdb.prot4455. http://www.cshprotocols.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/pdb.prot4455.

Ulehlova, B. 1992. Natural grasslands Micro-Organisms.

Ullah, Zia, and Sheikh Zeshan. 2020. “Effect of Substrate Type and Concentration on the Performance of a Double Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell.” Water Science and Technology 81(7): 1336–44.

Yadav, M., Lomash, A., Kapoor, S., Pandey, R., & Chauhan, N. S. (2021). Mapping of the benzoate metabolism by human gut microbiome indicates food-derived metagenome evolution. Scientific reports, 11(1), 5561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84964-6

Downloads

Published

2022-03-30

How to Cite

Thi My Linh, N., & The Hai, P. (2022). An in-depth study of substrate effect on the performance of BOD sensor type microbial fuel cell. Vietnam Journal of Biotechnology, 20(1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.15625/1811-4989/16056

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)