User willingness to pay for natural resource conservation at  Bach Long Vy Island, Vietnam

Chien Hoang Thi; Mitchell  Kirby; Lan Dinh Tran

doi:10.15625/2615-9783/16969

Author affiliations

Authors

Chien Hoang Thi Institute of Marine Environment and Resources, VAST, Hai Phong, 180000, Vietnam
Mitchell Kirby Southern Cross University, Lismore campus, Military road, East Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia
Lan Dinh Tran Institute of Marine Environment and Resources, VAST, Hai Phong, 180000, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9783/16969

Keywords:

Recreational value, contingent valuation, willingness to pay, subject sustainable tourism development

Abstract

Tourism development plays a crucial role in creating employment, boosting the revenue of the economy, supporting to improve the living standard. While tourism provides many opportunities to improve the well-being of local communities, the expansion of tourism needs to be effectively managed to avoid the degradation of natural capital. Assessing resource awareness and use behavior is an effective way to determine the public’s commitment to natural resource conservation and restoration in protected areas. The research was performed in Bach Long Vy Island (BLVI) in Hai Phong city, Viet Nam which is the first National Marine protected area designated by the Vietnamese Government. The aim of this study was to estimate tourists’ Willingness to pay (WTP) for natural resource conservation at BLVI through using Contingent valuation method (CVM) with the single-bounded dichotomous choice technique and the random utility model. We estimate the average visitor WTP is VND 153 370 per year (approx. US$6.58), while the aggregate WTP of tourists for the environmental conservation is VND 7.67 million per year (approx. US$32 900) (currency conversions taken as the average rate in September 2020; US$1 to VND 23280). The calculated results show that income and gender factors have significant effects visitors WTP whereas age and education have opposite effects. The outcomes of this research demonstrate the potential tourism value of this island due to the natural amenities and high biodiversity, particularly originating from its marine ecosystems. This result provides valuable scientific information for decision makers and local authorities and should be useful in establishing strategies to prevent the deterioration of ecosystems at BLVI (e.g., an environmental charge or entrance fee), thus contributing to sustainable tourism development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed M., Umali G.M., Chong C.K., Rull M.F., Garcia M.C., 2007. Valuing recreational and conservation benefits of coral reefs-The case of Bolinao, Philippines. Ocean & Coastal Management, 50(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.08.010.

Amarnath D., Komagal M., 2014. An Economic Analysis of Sago Pollution in Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary, 2(7), 150-170.

Apps K., Dimmock K., Huveneers C., 2018. Turning wildlife experiences into conservation action: Can white shark cage-dive tourism influence conservation behaviour?. Marine Policy, 88, 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.024.

Arcury T.A., Scollay S.J., Johnson T.P., 1987. Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: The case of acid rain. Sex Roles, 16, 463-472.

Baral S., Basnyat B., Khanal R., Gauli K., 2016. A total economic valuation of wetland ecosystem services: an evidence from Jagadishpur Ramsar site. Nepal. Sci. World J., 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2605609.

Bennett N.J., Dearden P., 2014. Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine Policy, 44, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.017.

Bulte E., Gerking S., List J.A., De Zeeuw A., 2005. The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study. Journal of environmental Economics and Management, 49(2), 330-342.

Bushell R., Bricker K., 2016. Tourism in protected areas: Developing meaningful standards. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 17(1), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358416636173.

Carlsson Fredrik, Johansson-Stenman, Olof, 2000. Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden. Appl. Econ., 32(6), 661e669.

Chen J.-L., Chuang C.-T., Jan R.-Q., Liu L.-C., Jan M.-S., 2013. Recreational Benefits of Ecosystem Services on and around Artificial Reefs: A Case Study in Penghu, Taiwan. Ocean & coastal management, 85, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.09.005.

Ciriacy-Wantrup S.V., 1947. Capital returns from soil-conservation practices. Journal of farm economics, 29(4), 1181-1196. https://doi.org/10.2307/1232747.

Clara I., Dyack B., Rolfe J., Newton A., Borg D., Povilanskas R., Brito A.C., 2018. The value of coastal lagoons: Case study of recreation at the Ria de Aveiro, Portugal in comparison to the Coorong, Australia. Journal for Nature Conservation, 43, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.10.012.

Cook D., Eiríksdóttir K., Davíðsdóttir B., Kristófersson D.M., 2018. The contingent valuation study of Heiðmörk, Iceland - Willingness to pay for its preservation. Journal of environmental management, 209, 126-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.045.

Costanza R., De Groot R., Sutton P., Van der Ploeg S., Anderson S.J., Kubiszewski I., Farber S., Turner R.K., 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global environmental change, 26, 152-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.

De Groot R., Brander L., Van Der Ploeg S., Costanza R., Bernard F., Braat L., Christie M., Crossman N., Ghermandi A., Hein L., 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50-61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005.

De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological economics, 41(3), 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7.

De Silva D.G., Pownall R.A., 2014. Going green: does it depend on education, gender or income?. Applied Economics, 46(5), 573-586.

Diamond P.A., Hausman J.A., 1994. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45-64.

Englin J., Mendelsohn R., 1991. A hedonic travel cost analysis for valuation of multiple components of site quality: The recreation value of forest management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 21(3), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(91)90031-D.

Farr M., Stoeckl N., Beg R.A., 2011. The efficiency of the environmental management charge in the cairns management area of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55(3), 322-41. Doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.186960.

Felipe-Lucia M.R., Comín F.A., Escalera-Reyes J., 2015. A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services. AMBIO, 44, 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0555-2.

Fernandes L, Ridgley M., Van’t Hof T., 1999. Multiple criteria analysis integrates economic, ecological and social objectives for coral reef managers. Coral Reefs, 18(4), 393-402.

Fisher A.C., 2005. Investment under uncertainty and option value in environmental economics: reply. Resource and Energy Economics, 27(1), 89.

Haab T.C., McConnell K.E., 2002. Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Heagney E.C., Rose J.M., Ardeshiri A., Kovac M., 2019. The economic value of tourism and recreation across a large protected area network. Land Use Policy, 88, p.104084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104084.

Hidano N., Kato T., Aritomi M., 2005. Benefits of participating in contingent valuation mail surveys and their effects on respondent behavior: a panel analysis. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 63-80.

Jala, Nandagiri L., 2015. Evaluation of Economic Value of Pilikula Lake Using Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Methods. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1315-1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.171.

Jarvis D., Stoeckl N., Liu H.-B., 2017. New methods for valuing, and for identifying spatial variations, in cultural services: a case study of the Great Barrier Reef. Ecosyst. Serv., 24, 58-67.

King E., Cavender-Bares J., Balvanera P., Mwampamba T.H., Polasky S., 2015. Tradeoffs in ecosystem services and varying stakeholder preferences: evaluating conflicts, obstacles, and opportunities. Ecol. Soc., 20, art25.

Kirkbride-Smith A.E., Wheeler P.M., Johnson M.L., 2016. Artificial reefs and marine protected areas: a study in willingness to pay to access Folkestone Marine Reserve, Barbados, West Indies. PeerJ., 4, p. e2175. Doi: 10.7717/peerj.2175.

Kittinger J.N., Finkbeiner E.M., Glazier E.W., Crowder L.B., 2012. Human dimensions of coral reef social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc., 17(4), 17.

Kostakis I., Sardianou E., 2012. Which factors affect the willingness of tourists to pay for renewable energy?. Renewable Energy, 38(1), 169-72.

Lan T.D., Huyen N.T.M., Thu N.T., 2016. Economic valuation of marine and island typical ecosystems for sustainable development of some frontier islands in Vietnam coastal waters. In Collection of highlighted results from scientific and technological projects under the program KC.09/11‐15. Hanoi: Publishing House of Natural Science and Technology, 921-994 (in Vietnamese).

Laurila-Pant M., Lehikoinen A., Uusitalo L., Venesjärvi R., 2015. How to value biodiversity in environmental management?. Ecological Indicators, 55, 1-11.

Lee C.K, W. Mjelde J., 2007. Valuation of ecotourism resources using a contingent valuation method: The case of the Korean DMZ. Ecological Economics, 63(2), 511-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.011.

Limaei S.M., Safari G., Merceh G.M., 2016. Recreational values of forest park using the contingent valuation method (Case study: Saravan Forest Park, north of Iran). Journal of Forest Science, 62(10), 452-462. https://doi.org/10.17221/4/2016-JFS.

Liu J., Liu N., Zhang Y., Qu Z., Yu J., 2019. Evaluation of the non-use value of beach tourism resources: A case study of Qingdao coastal scenic area, China. Ocean & Coastal Management, 168, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.030.

Lopes P.F.M., Pacheco S., Clauzet M., Silvano R.A.M., Begossi A., 2015. Fisheries, tourism, and marine protected areas: Conflicting or synergistic interactions?. Ecosystem Services, 16, 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.003.

Meyer A., 2015. Does education increase pro-environmental behavior? Evidence from Europe. Ecological economics, 116, 108-121.

Neher C., Duffield J., Patterson D., 2013. Valuation of national park system visitation: the efficient use of count data models, meta-analysis, and secondary visitor survey data. Environmental Management, 52(3), 683-698. Doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0080-2.

Nord, Mark, Luloff A.E., Bridger, Jeffrey C., 1998. The association of forest recreation with environmentalism. Environ. Behav., 30(2), 235e246.

Pham T.T.T., 2020. Tourism in marine protected areas: Can it be considered as an alternative livelihood for local communities?. Marine Policy, 115, 103891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103891.

Resende F., Fernandes G., Andrade D., Néder H., 2017. Economic valuation of the ecosystem services provided by a protected area in the Brazilian Cerrado: application of the contingent valuation method. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 77(4), 762-773. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.21215.

Reynisdottir M., Song H., Agrusa J., 2008. Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study. Tourism Management, 29(6), 1076-1083.

Robles-Zavala E., Reynoso A.G.C., 2018. The recreational value of coral reefs in the Mexican Pacific. Ocean & Coastal Management, 157, 1-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.010.

Rolfe J., Dyack B., 2010. Testing for convergent validity between travel cost and contingent valuation estimates of recreation values in the Coorong, Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(4), 583-899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00513.x.

Smith V.K, Kaoru Y., 1990. What have we learned since hotelling's letter?: A meta-analysis. Economics Letters, 32(3), 267-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(90)90110-M.

Stoltzfus J.C., 2011. Logistic regression: a brief primer. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(10), 1099-1104. Doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01185.

Tonin S., 2019. Estimating the benefits of restoration And preservation scenarios of marine biodiversity: An application of the contingent valuation method. Environmental Science & Policy, 100, 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.004.

Tran D.T., Nguyen V.Q., Tran D.L., Nguyen T.M.H., 2014. Bach Long Vy national marine protected area: potential and solutions for promoting values. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 14(3A), 281-291 (in Vietnamese).

Tran D.T., Tran D.L., Nguyen T.M.H., Dinh V.H., 2013. Nature and environment in Bach Long Vi island and sea, Hanoi: Publishing House of Natural Science and Technology, 275 (in Vietnamese). Doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4897.5608.

Venkatachalam L ., 2004. The contigent valuation method: a review. Environmental impact assessment review, 24(1), 89-124.

Veisten K., Hoen H.F., Navrud S., Strand J., 2004. Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Management, 73(4), 317-331.

Witt B., 2019. Tourists’ willingness to pay increased entrance fees at Mexican protected areas: A multi-site contingent valuation study. Sustainability, 11(11), 3041. Doi: 10.3390/su11113041.

Wu Q., Bi X., Grogan K.A., Borisova T., 2018. Valuing the recreation benefits of natural springs in Florida. Water, 10(10), 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101379.

Xiao C., Dunlap R.E., Hong D., 2013. The nature and bases of environmental concern among Chinese citizens. Social Science Quarterly, 94(3), 672-690.

Yee S.H., Carriger J.F., Bradley P., Fisher W.S., Dyson B., 2015. Developing scientific information to support decisions for sustainable coral reef ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 115, 39-50.

Yee S.H., Dittmar J.A., Oliver L.M., 2014. Comparison of methods for quantifying reef ecosystem services: A case study mapping services for St. Croix, USVI. Ecosystem Services, 8, 1-15.

Yu B., Cai Y., Jin L., Du B., 2018. Effects on willingness to pay for marine conservation: Evidence from Zhejiang Province, China. Sustainability, 10(7), p.2298. Doi: 10.3390/su10072298.