Experimental evaluation of a single geogrid-reinforced stone column under varying surrounding soil conditions: Effects on bearing capacity and elastic modulus
Author affiliations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9783/23990Keywords:
Stone column, geogrid reinforcement, elastic modulus, load test, bearing capacity, laboratory model, soft clay, soil consistencyAbstract
This experimental study evaluates the influence of soil consistency on the ultimate bearing capacity and elastic modulus of single geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced stone columns installed in soft-to-very soft clay. Laboratory model tests were conducted in the Ho Thuong Tin area of Hanoi, Vietnam, under three controlled soil conditions with liquidity indices (IL) of 0.78, 1.0, and 1.5. A total of six displacement-controlled load tests were performed in a unit-cell setup, with and without a geogrid reinforcement layer at the column head. Results show that the inclusion of geogrid significantly enhanced both the ultimate bearing capacity and stiffness of the stone column: the bearing capacity increased by approximately 12–25%, and the elastic modulus (E₅₀) increased by 19–27% relative to unreinforced columns. The study indicates that geogrid reinforcement at the column head provides a technically material-saving and straightforward alternative to complete encasement, with potential economic advantages particularly for soft clays where lateral confinement is limited. The findings provide new experimental data to inform the design of geogrid-reinforced stone columns under varying soil conditions.
Downloads
References
Barksdale R.D., Bachus R.C., 1983. Georgia Institute of Technology. School of Civil Engineering. Design and construction of stone columns, I (No. FHWA/RD-83/026;SCEGIT-83-104).
Bergado D.T., Singh N., Sim S.H., Panichayatum B., Sampaco C.L., Balasubramaniam A.S., 1990. Improvement of soft Bangkok clay using vertical geotextile band drains compared with granular piles. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 9, 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(90)90054-G.
Black J., Sivakumar V., McKinley J.D., 2007a. Performance of clay samples reinforced with vertical granular columns. Can. Geotech. J., 44, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-081.
Black J., Sivakumar V., McKinley J.D., 2007b. Performance of clay samples reinforced with vertical granular columns. Can. Geotech. J., 44, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-081.
Bowles J.E., 1996. Foundation analysis and design, 5th ed. ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cheng Y., Mo H., Gu M., 2023. Numerical Analysis on the Behavior of Floating Geogrid-Encased Stone Column Improved Foundation. Buildings, 13, 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071609.
Dash S., Bora M., 2013. Improved performance of soft clay foundations using stone columns and geocell-sand mattress. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 41, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.09.001.
Dheerendra Babu M.R., Nayak S., Shivashankar R., 2013. A Critical Review of Construction, Analysis and Behaviour of Stone Columns. Geotech Geol Eng., 31, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9555-9.
Fatahi B., Basack S., Premananda S., Khabbaz H., 2012. Settlement prediction and back analysis of Young's modulus and dilation angle of stone columns. AJCE, 10. https://doi.org/10.7158/C11-700.2012.10.1
Fattah M., Shlash K., Jafar Al-Waily M., 2011. Stress Concentration Ratio of Model Stone Columns in Soft Clays. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 34. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103060.
Fattah M.Y., Al-Neami M.A., Shamel Al-Suhaily A., 2017. Estimation of bearing capacity of floating group of stone columns. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 20, 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2017.03.005.
Gniel J., Bouazza A., 2009. Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.001.
Gu M., Mo H., Qiu J., Yuan J., Xia Q., 2022. Behavior of floating stone columns reinforced with geogrid encasement in model tests. Frontiers in Materials, 9, 980851. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.980851.
Han J., 2002. A Theoretical Solution for Consolidation Rates of Stone Column-Reinforced Foundations Accounting for Smear and Well Resistance Effects. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2002)2:2(135).
Han J., Ye S.-L., 2001. Simplified Method for Consolidation Rate of Stone Column Reinforced Foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127, 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:7(597).
Hardin B.O., Black W.L., 1968. Vibration Modulus of Normally Consolidated Clay. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 94, 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001100.
Hasan M., Samadhiya N., 2016. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Floating Granular Piles in Soft Clays. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0062-6.
Hughes J.M.O., Withers N.J., Greenwood D.A., 1975. A field trial of the reinforcing effect of a stone column in soil. Geotechnique, 25, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.31.
Indraratna B., Basack S., Rujikiatkamjorn C., 2013. Numerical Solution of Stone Column-Improved Soft Soil Considering Arching, Clogging, and Smear Effects. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 139, 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000789
Kahyaoğlu M.R., Doğan T., 2022. Numerical Study on the Deformation Behavior of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns Supporting Embankments. Teknik Dergi, 33, 12617–12634. https://doi.org/10.18400/tekderg.949826
Ling Z., Ze-yu X.U., Ming-hua Z., 2020. Experimental research on behaviors of geogrid-encased stone column-improved composite foundation under cyclic loads. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 42(12), 2198–2205. https://doi.org/10.11779/CJGE202012005.
Madhav M.R., Poorooshasb H.B., 1988. A new model for geosynthetic reinforced soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 6, 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-352X(88)90070-5.
McCabe B., Egan D., Nimmons G., 2009. A review of field performance of stone columns in soft soils. Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers-geotechnical Engineering - Proc Inst Civil Eng-Geotech E., 162, 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2009.162.6.323.
Miranda M., Da Costa A., 2016. Laboratory analysis of encased stone columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 44, 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.12.001.
Mitchell J.K., 1981. State of the art-soil improvement, in: Proceedings of the 10th ICSMFE, 509–565.
Muzammil S., Varghese R., Joseph J., 2018. Numerical Simulation of the Response of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns Under Oil Storage Tank. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0122-6.
Ng K.S., Tan S., 2015. Settlement Prediction of Stone Column Group. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng., 1, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-015-0034-2.
Pham T.B., Dam D.N., Bui T.Q.A., Nguyen D.M., Vu T.T., 2022. Estimation of load-bearing capacity of bored piles using machine learning models. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 44(4), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9783/17177.
Priebe H.J., 1995. The design of vibro replacement. Ground Engineering.
Singh, I., Sahu, A., 2019. A Review on Stone Columns used for Ground Improvement of Soft Soil. https://doi.org/10.11159/icgre19.132.
Srijan, Ashok Kumar Gupta, 2023. "Horizontally Layered and Vertically Encased Geosynthetic Reinforced Stone Column: An Experimental Analysis" Applied Sciences, 13(15), 8660. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13158660.
Yoo C., Lee D., 2012. Performance of geogrid-encased stone columns in soft ground: Full-scale load tests. Geosynthetics International, 19, 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.12.00033.
Zhang X., Liu H., Wang L., 2024. Field tests on partially geotextile encased stone column-supported soft clay foundations. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 53, 1–15. https://10.1016/j.geotexmem.2023.09.005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
