Effects of photoperiods on the development of Diplonychus rusticus (Fabricius, 1871) (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae): connections to light pollution

Ha Anh Nguyen, Phuc Van Nguyen, Anh Duc Tran, Cuong Van Duong
Author affiliations

Authors

  • Ha Anh Nguyen Department of Applied Zoology, Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Ha Noi, Vietnam
  • Phuc Van Nguyen Department of Applied Zoology, Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Ha Noi, Vietnam
  • Anh Duc Tran Department of Applied Zoology, Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Ha Noi, Vietnam
  • Cuong Van Duong Department of Applied Zoology, Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Ha Noi, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9023/23033

Keywords:

Aquatic bugs, conservation, environmental stress, life cycle, urbanization effects

Abstract

Light pollution caused by artificial light at night has significant impacts on biodiversity, particularly on insects that are strongly attracted to light, by disrupting their physiology and ecological interactions. The aquatic bug, Diplonychus rusticus is an important invertebrate predator in most freshwater habitats of Southeast Asia, particularly in lentic systems such as wetlands and ponds. The species is also known for its high potential in controlling mosquito vectors of transmitted diseases in urban areas, where light pollution has become increasingly prevalent. While the species is not attracted to the light, we aim to examine whether light pollution influences the development, survival and fertility of D. rusticus by exposing them to different photoperiods. Our study revealed that the development time from the first instar to the adult stage was positively correlated with the daily duration of light exposure, whereas the body size (length and width) of all life stages was not affected by photoperiods. In addition, the survival rate and fertility of adult bugs are considerably decreased under prolonged lighting conditions. These results have provided insights into the impacts of light pollution on the aquatic insects that are not attracted to the light showing a necessary strategy for future conservation efforts for insects in urban environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bennie J. J., Duffy J. P., Inger R., Gaston K. J., 2014. Biogeography of time partitioning in mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(38): 13727–13732. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1216063110

Brinkhuis B. H., 1985. Handbook of Phycological Methods, Ecological Field Methods: Macroalgae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 461–477.

Brüning A., Hölker F., Wolter C., 2011. Artificial light at night: Implications for early life stages development in four temperate freshwater fish species. Aquatic Sciences, 73(1): 143–152. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00027-010-0167-2

Cymborowski B., Giebułtowicz J. M., 1976. Effect of photoperiod on development and fecundity in the flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella. Journal of Insect Physiology, 22(9): 1213–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0022-1910(76)90096-2

Dacke M., Baird E., Byrne M., Scholtz C. H., Warrant E. J., 2013. Dung beetles use the Milky Way for orientation. Current Biology, 23(4): 298–300. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cub.2012.12.034

Das J., Maity J., 2023. Biological control of mosquito larvae using aquatic insect, Diplonychus sp. Journal of Applied Entomologist, 3(3): 8–16. https://dzarc.com/ entomology/article/view/376

Davies T. W., Duffy J. P., Bennie J., Gaston K. J., 2014. The nature, extent, and ecological implications of marine light pollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12: 347–355. https://doi.org/ 10.1890/130281

Desouhant E., Gomes E., Mondy N., Amat I., 2019. Mechanistic, ecological, and evolutionary consequences of artificial light at night for insects: review and prospective. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 167(1): 37–58. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/eea.12754

Duong C. V., Tran U. T. P., Nguyen V. V., Bae Y. J., 2021. Predator selection and predator-prey interactions for the biological control of mosquito dengue vectors in northern Vietnam. Journal of Vector Ecology, 46(2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.52707/1081-1710-46.2.163

Durrant J., Michaelides E. B., Rupasinghe T., Tull D., Green M. P., Jones T. M., 2015. Constant illumination reduces circulating melatonin and impairs immune function in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus. PeerJ, 3: e1075. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj. 1075

Falchi F., Furgoni R., Gallaway T. A., Rybnikova N. A., Portnov B. A., Baugh K., et al., 2019. Light pollution in USA and Europe: The good, the bad and the ugly. Journal of Environmental Management, 248: 109227. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jenvman.2019.06.128

Gaston K. J., Bennie J., Davies T. W., Hopkins J., 2013. The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: A mechanistic appraisal. Biological Reviews, 88(4): 912–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12036

Gaston K. J., Visser M. E., Hölker F., 2015. The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1667): 20140133. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb. 2014.0133

Horváth G., Kriska G., Malik P., Robertson B., 2009. Polarized light pollution: a new kind of ecological photopollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(6):

317–325. https://doi.org/10.1890/080129

Hölker F., Wolter C., Perkin E. K., Tockner K., 2010. Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(12): 681–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tree.2010.09.007

Kalinkat G., Grubisic M., Jechow A., van Grunsven R. H., Schroer S., Hölker F., 2021. Assessing long-term effects of artificial light at night on insects: what is missing and how to get there. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 14(2): 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12482

Kim K. N., Jo Y. C., Huang Z. J., Song H. S., Ryu K. H., Huang Q. Y., Lei C. L., 2020. Influence of green light illumination at night on biological characteristics of the oriental armyworm, Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 110(1): 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000748531 9000397

Koyama T., Mirth C. K., 2018. Unravelling the diversity of mechanisms through which nutrition regulates body size in insects. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 25: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois. 2017.11.002

Kryspin I., Dutkowski A. B., Cymborowski B., 1974. The influence of illumination conditions on growth and development of Galleria mellonella. Bulletin of the Academy of Polish Sciences: Biological Sciences, 22(11): 803–808. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4455363/

McLay L. K., Green M. P., Jones T. M., 2017. Chronic exposure to dim artificial light at night decreases fecundity and adult survival in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Insect Physiology, 100: 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2017.04.009

Millanes J. M., Javier P. A., 2019. Biology of the predatory water bug, Diplonychus rusticus (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae), on prey Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) wrigglers. Philippine Entomologist, 33(2): 113–128. https://thephilippineentomologist.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2_Millanes-_-Javier_2019.pdf.

Nguyen Hai Van, Nguyen Thi Minh, 2017. Research on using endophytic bacteria isolated from different ecosystems. Vietnam J Agri Sci., 15: 605–618 (In Vietnamese with English summary).

Nguyen Thi Huong, Le Nhu Hau, Vu Thi Mo, 2010. Preliminary study on storage of seaweeds to establish ex-situ conservation. Proceedings of the scientific conference celebrating the 35th anniversary of the establishment of the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology: 254–259 (In Vietnamese with English summary).

Nijhout H. F., 2003. The control of body size in insects. Developmental Biology, 261(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00276-8

Ohba S. Y., 2019. Ecology of giant water bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Belostomatidae). Entomological Science, 22(1): 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12334

Owens A. C., Cochard P., Durrant J., Farnworth B., Perkin E. K., Seymoure B., 2020. Light pollution is a driver of insect declines. Biological Conservation, 241: 108259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon. 2019.108259

Parkinson E., Lawson J., Tiegs S. D., 2020. Artificial light at night at the terrestrial-aquatic interface: Effects on predators and fluxes of insect prey. PLOS ONE, 15(10): e0240138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0240138

Rajan A., 2015. Predatory efficiency of Diplonychus rusticus (Fabricius, 1871) against Culex larvae. European Journal of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, 2(3): 127–132. https://mcmed.us/ downloads/143200457432.pdf.

Richter K., Peschke E., Peschke D., 2000. A neuroendocrine releasing effect of melatonin in the brain of an insect, Periplaneta americana (L.). Journal of Pineal Research, 28(3): 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-079x.2001.280301.x

Ruchin A. B., 2020. Effect of illumination on fish and amphibian: development, growth, physiological and biochemical processes. Reviews in Aquaculture, 13(1): 567–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/RAQ.12487

Sanders D., Frago E., Kehoe R., Patterson C., Gaston K. J., 2021. A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5(1): 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01322-x

Smolensky M. H., Sackett-Lundeen L. L., Portaluppi F., 2015. Nocturnal light pollution and underexposure to daytime sunlight: Complementary mechanisms of circadian disruption and related diseases. Chronobiology International, 32(8): 1029–1048. https://doi.org/10.3109/0742 0528.2015.1072002

Thakurdas P., Sharma S., Vanlalhriatpuia K., Sinam B., Chib M., Shivagaje A., Joshi D., 2009. Light at night alters the parameters of the eclosion rhythm in a tropical fruit fly, Drosophila jambulina. Chronobiology International, 26(8): 1575–1586. https://doi.org/10.3109/0742 0520903529765

Van Geffen K. G., van Grunsven R. H., van Ruijven J., Berendse F., Veenendaal E. M., 2014. Artificial light at night causes diapause inhibition and sex-specific life history changes in a moth. Ecology and Evolution, 4(11): 2082–2089. https://doi.org/10.1002/ECE3.1090

Van Langevelde F., Van Grunsven R. H., Veenendaal E. M., Fijen T. P., 2017. Artificial night lighting inhibits feeding in moths. Biology Letters, 13(3): 20160874. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSBL.2016.0874

Wonglersak R., Fenberg P. B., Langdon P. G., Brooks S. J., Price B. W., 2020. Temperature-body size responses in insects: a case study of British Odonata. Ecological Entomology, 45(4): 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/EEN.12853

Yadav P., Sharma V. K., 2014. Correlated changes in life history traits in response to selection for faster pre-adult development in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology, 217(4): 580–589. https://doi.org/10.1242/JEB. 093864

Downloads

Published

24-03-2026

How to Cite

Nguyen, H. A., Van Nguyen, P., Duc Tran, A., & Van Duong, C. (2026). Effects of photoperiods on the development of Diplonychus rusticus (Fabricius, 1871) (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae): connections to light pollution. Academia Journal of Biology, 48(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9023/23033

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.