A mesoscale numerical approach to predict damage behavior in concrete basing on phase field method
Author affiliations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-7136/15334Keywords:
concrete material, damage, phase field method, Monte Carlo’s simulationAbstract
In this paper, we develop a numerical approach to simulate the 2D complex damage and fracture process of quasi-brittle concrete materials. Based on the phase field theory for the case of elastic isotropic multicomponent materials and the generation process based upon Monte Carlo’s simulation method, we construct a numerical procedure to solve complex damage thermodynamic problems. The diffusive phase field variable obtained from this calculation can be used to represent the crack nucleation and propagation within 2D complex mesostructure. Some factors that affect the numerical result (type of crack density function and type of split decomposition of strain energy) are accounted to make the predictions more accurate for the case of concrete material. Some new numerical examples are provided to show the usefulness of the approach.
Downloads
Metrics
References
G. Constantinides and F.-J. Ulm. The effect of two types of CSH on the elasticity of cementbased materials: Results from nanoindentation and micromechanical modeling. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, (1), (2004), pp. 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00230-8.
P. Wriggers and S. O. Moftah. Mesoscale models for concrete: Homogenisation and damage behaviour. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 42, (7), (2006), pp. 623–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2005.11.008.
N. Ile, X.-H. Nguyen, P. Kotronis, J. Mazars, and J. M. Reynouard. Shaking table tests of lightly rc walls: Numerical simulations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12, (6), (2008), pp. 849–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460801890430.
T. T. Nguyen, J. Yvonnet, Q. Z. Zhu, M. Bornert, and C. Chateau. A phase field method to simulate crack nucleation and propagation in strongly heterogeneous materials from direct imaging of their microstructure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 139, (2015), pp. 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.03.045.
G. A. Francfort and J. J. Marigo. Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 46, (8), (1998), pp. 1319–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5096(98)00034-9.
X. Li, D. Chu, Y. Gao, and Z. Liu. Numerical study on crack propagation in linear elastic multiphase composite materials using phase field method. Engineering Computations, 36, (2019), pp. 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-03-2018-0116.
C. Miehe, M. Hofacker, and F. Welschinger. A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, (199), (2010), pp. 2765–2778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011.
T. T. Nguyen, Y. Yvonnet, M. Bornert, C. C. Chateau, K. Sab, R. Romani, and B. Le Roy. On the choice of parameters in the phase field method for simulating crack initiation with experimental validation. International Journal of Fracture, 197, (2), (2016), pp. 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-016-0082-1.
H. Amor, J. J. Marigo, and C. Maurini. Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 57, (8), (2009), pp. 1209–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011.
T. T. Nguyen, J. Yvonnet, Q.-Z. Zhu, M. Bornert, and C. Chateau. A phase field method for computational modeling of interfacial damage interacting with crack propagation in realistic microstructures obtained by microtomography. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 312, (2016), pp. 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2015.10.007.
T. T. Nguyen, J. Yvonnet, D. Waldmann, and Q. C. He. Phase field modeling of interfacial damage in heterogeneous media with stiff and soft interphases. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, (2019), pp. 106–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106574.
C. M. López, I. Carol, and A. Aguado. Meso-structural study of concrete fracture using interface element I: numerical model and tensile behavior. Materials and Structures, 41, (2007), pp. 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9314-1.
X. F. Wang, Z. J. Yang, J. R. Yates, A. P. Jivkov, and C. Zhang. Monte Carlo simulation of mesoscale fracture modelling of concrete with random aggregates and pores. Construction and Building Materials, 15, (2015), pp. 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.069.
Z. P. Bazant, M. R. Tabbara, M. T. Kazemi, and G. Pijaudier-Cabot. Random particle model for facture of aggregate or fiber composites. Journal of Engineering Mechanic, 116, (1990), pp. 1686–1705. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1990)116:8(1686).
E. Schlangen and J. G. M. van Mier. Simple lattice model for numerical simulation of fracture of concrete materials and structures. Materials and Structures, 25, (156), (1992), pp. 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02472449.
G. D. Schutter and L. Taerwe. Random particle model for concrete based on Delaunay triangulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanic, 26, (156), (1993), pp. 1686–1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02472853.
J. G. M. van Mier and M. R. A. V. Vliet. Influence of microstructure of concrete on size/scale effects in tensile fracture. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 70, (16), (2003), pp. 2281–2306. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-7944(02)00222-9.
D. A. Hordijk. Tensile and tensile fatigue behaviour of concrete: experiments, modelling and analyses. Heron, 37, (1992), pp. 1–79.
C. Miehe, M. Hofacker, and F. Welschinger. Thermodynamically consistent phasefield models of fractures: variational principles and multi-field FE implementations. International Journal for Numerical Method in Engineering, (83), (2010), pp. 1273–1311. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2861.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
